General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Transitional phrase punctuation

"It rained all day, and, as a result, the hut collapsed."

No, it's not a run-on: the sentence comprises a coordination of two main clauses, marked as such by the coordinator "and". But it does exhibit unnecessarily heavy punctuation: there too many commas interrupting the flow, making it make it jerky to read. It would be much better, and perfectly normal, to have lighter punctuation by omitting the comma after "and". Consider these alternants:

(1) "It rained all day and the hut collapsed."

(2) "It rained all day and, as a result, the hut collapsed".

In (1) there is no adjunct and the sentence is perfectly fine without any commas at all. With that in mind, it is clear that if we insert the adjunct "as a result", all that is needed is commas to mark the boundaries of the adjunct itself, as in (2).

The lighter punctuation makes the sentence much smoother to read, and causes no confusion as to the intended meaning.


PaulM