Duane funny you do not know that there was no evidence that Saddam had anything to do with 9-11 attack. If that was the case why did we go into Afghanistan first, then Iraq and leave Afghanistan an un complete mission.

Duane,

I thought that you said that you wrote in English?

John R...

How do you people know there was no evidence hussien wasnt involved in the attack. Didnt he tell each of you personally. Of course he didnt take out full page ads in the NY T's. He know doubt expected a Klinton Gore response that he was used to democrats not doing anything. You guys are always ready to defend him because of the close ties democrats hand and have to any and all terrorists.
By hitting the al queda and taliban militarily. the bush administration was trying to knock them out. the U S had allies in afghanistan who did most of the fighting. Saddam Hussien had a lot of resources that could be used and were used against us and our allies.
Now i dont think that Osama is alive he hasnt shown his face for along time. you guys keep saying that he is stronger but you only say that because you want him, and the terrorists to defeat the U S. You're being true to your cause.

Duane: I don't know that there is no evidence that you weren't involved in the attack. I don't know that there is no evidence that Bush & Cheney weren't involved in the attack. I don't even know that there is no evidence that The Pope wasn't involved in the attack.
You see how it works Dufus! The lack of evidence does not constitute evidence one way or the other.

Mad doc and as i said before the Mad in your name must be the original meaning as in mad hatter.
Saddam had the motive to attack the united states. In 1991 the United states stopped him from controlling most of the worlds oil supply when it stopped him from owning Kuwait and then Saudai Arabia. Or hasnt Hussien allowed you to read that?
You and the rest here are such american hating mush minded liberals . You dont recognize motive. You probably believe o j simpson is innocent of decapitating his ex wife and her friend. There was all kinds of evidence but the L A district attorney couldnt use it because the fires of Los angeles would have been visible for hindreds of miles. It is the same with saddam . Had he been allowed to remain in powere there would have been more attacks on american citys as there will be when Hussien obama takes control.

There would have been NO riot if OJ was Convicted. Every Riot LA went threw had something to do with the LAPD and LASO Heavy handed tactics against the People that they were sworn to "Protect and Serve".

In fact it was the sloppy police work of the LAPD and the Slam Dunk Attitude of the DA Office that Blew the OJ Case.

To Compare the OJ Trial to the 9/11 attacks is purely Idiotic!