Re: Re: Re: Re: Getting Rid of Rude Medallion Holders & Political appointees
Your mission, should you decide to accept it, Mr. Mirtz, it to get that requirement back on the law books.
Hysterically and/or Historically:
The annual lottery system of medallion distribution -- the best thing those LONG-EARED GALLOOTS* in City Hall ever came up with -- was removed to (1)pave the way for "big money" to gobble up the medallions at "prices" that no working stiff could ever hope to come up with or secure a loan on and (2) to "induce" single-license owner-operators and small fleet guys to sell out.
So much for a moment of true ENLIGTENED VISION...
*!!!(yes, it is an anagram for "ald. allen's too ogre")!!!
Re: Re: Re: Getting Rid of Rude Medallion Holders & Political appointees
No one suggested that the city take medallions away from single-unit owner-operators.
The idea is to "recycle" the medallions held by the giants, many of which are rusting on the streets with no drivers.
The ultimate goal, I think, is to get the licenses out of the hands of the giants and into the hands of the drivers or their designated managers.
It seems to be a mutually beneficial deal. Everybody does what they do best.
The giants get to operate as usual, renting and maintaining cars with taxi equipment in them to licensed chauffeurs.
The fianancial angle is a big speed hump in the road to taxi bliss and happiness.
At a price tag of $135,00 to $150,000 per medallion the city ( the taxpayers ) would have bite the big buy-back bullet.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
There you go again making ridiculous statments Mirtzy. Drivers have been struggling to pay for their medallions for years and you just want the city to ignore that fact and just give them away to other drivers.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Anybody who's been a taxi driver for more than ten years should just be given a medallion.
The bottom line result would bring the "price" of a medallion transfer in line with reality of the marketplace.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
No one suggested that the city take medallions away from single-unit owner-operators.
The idea is to "recycle" the medallions held by the giants, many of which are rusting on the streets with no drivers.
The ultimate goal, I think, is to get the licenses out of the hands of the giants and into the hands of the drivers or their designated managers.
It seems to be a mutually beneficial deal. Everybody does what they do best.
The giants get to operate as usual, renting and maintaining cars with taxi equipment in them to licensed chauffeurs.
The fianancial angle is a big speed hump in the road to taxi bliss and happiness.
At a price tag of $135,00 to $150,000 per medallion the city ( the taxpayers ) would have bite the big buy-back bullet.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
There you go again making ridiculous statments Mirtzy. Drivers have been struggling to pay for their medallions for years and you just want the city to ignore that fact and just give them away to other drivers.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Anybody who's been a taxi driver for more than ten years should just be given a medallion.
