Does this apply to driver-on-driver assualt?
Like, what if I go berserk and start wailing on some jerk in the airport staging lot (Midway or O'Hare)?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
ATTENTION UTCC, AUPD, CPTDA legal staff -- Here is a Propose new city law (ex-cons, fake newspaper publishers and editors should stay out of this altogether):
MCC #-#-### *Definitions – Assault on an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER defined – Mandatory sentence.
(#) There is hereby created the offense of assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR. A person commits assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
-wjw-
*It shall become known as Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Olympic Games Initiative on Taxi Safety and Security.
Any volunteers who happen to have the City Council membership in their address book who wants email this out to all 50 of them?
-wjw-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Yup, Assault not Battery, a mandatory 90 days imprisonment.
The case cited by the City in its Motion in the pending injunction suit shows that the City does take seriously actions in fighting crimes beyond the state's Criminal Codes under the home rules.
"A crime consists of two parts: prohibited conduct and a penalty for an infraction. In other words, a prescribed penalty is as necessary to constitute a crime as its definition. A statute that prohibits conduct without a penalty is a nullity."
705 N.E.2d 81
184 Ill.2d 504, 235 Ill.Dec. 468
The CITY OF CHICAGO v. Edwin ROMAN
No. 84268.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Dec. 17, 1998.
_____________________________________
MCC 8-4-080 Definitions – Assault defined – Mandatory sentence.
(2) There is hereby created the offense of assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped. A person commits assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
(Prior code § 193-1.7; Added Coun. J. 4-13-84, p. 6076)
The law should apply to all including to drivers. If two drivers are assaulting with each other on duty, they both should be in prison for at least 90 days.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Does this apply to driver-on-driver assualt?
Like, what if I go berserk and start wailing on some jerk in the airport staging lot (Midway or O'Hare)?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
ATTENTION UTCC, AUPD, CPTDA legal staff -- Here is a Propose new city law (ex-cons, fake newspaper publishers and editors should stay out of this altogether):
MCC #-#-### *Definitions – Assault on an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER defined – Mandatory sentence.
(#) There is hereby created the offense of assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR. A person commits assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
-wjw-
*It shall become known as Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Olympic Games Initiative on Taxi Safety and Security.
Any volunteers who happen to have the City Council membership in their address book who wants email this out to all 50 of them?
-wjw-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Yup, Assault not Battery, a mandatory 90 days imprisonment.
The case cited by the City in its Motion in the pending injunction suit shows that the City does take seriously actions in fighting crimes beyond the state's Criminal Codes under the home rules.
"A crime consists of two parts: prohibited conduct and a penalty for an infraction. In other words, a prescribed penalty is as necessary to constitute a crime as its definition. A statute that prohibits conduct without a penalty is a nullity."
705 N.E.2d 81
184 Ill.2d 504, 235 Ill.Dec. 468
The CITY OF CHICAGO v. Edwin ROMAN
No. 84268.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Dec. 17, 1998.
_____________________________________
MCC 8-4-080 Definitions – Assault defined – Mandatory sentence.
(2) There is hereby created the offense of assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped. A person commits assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
(Prior code § 193-1.7; Added Coun. J. 4-13-84, p. 6076)
What about the guys who are placing bets on the winner?
I found nothing in the law that says drivers cannot bet on driver fights.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The law should apply to all including to drivers. If two drivers are assaulting with each other on duty, they both should be in prison for at least 90 days.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Does this apply to driver-on-driver assualt?
Like, what if I go berserk and start wailing on some jerk in the airport staging lot (Midway or O'Hare)?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
ATTENTION UTCC, AUPD, CPTDA legal staff -- Here is a Propose new city law (ex-cons, fake newspaper publishers and editors should stay out of this altogether):
MCC #-#-### *Definitions – Assault on an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER defined – Mandatory sentence.
(#) There is hereby created the offense of assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR. A person commits assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
-wjw-
*It shall become known as Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Olympic Games Initiative on Taxi Safety and Security.
Any volunteers who happen to have the City Council membership in their address book who wants email this out to all 50 of them?
-wjw-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Yup, Assault not Battery, a mandatory 90 days imprisonment.
The case cited by the City in its Motion in the pending injunction suit shows that the City does take seriously actions in fighting crimes beyond the state's Criminal Codes under the home rules.
"A crime consists of two parts: prohibited conduct and a penalty for an infraction. In other words, a prescribed penalty is as necessary to constitute a crime as its definition. A statute that prohibits conduct without a penalty is a nullity."
705 N.E.2d 81
184 Ill.2d 504, 235 Ill.Dec. 468
The CITY OF CHICAGO v. Edwin ROMAN
No. 84268.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Dec. 17, 1998.
_____________________________________
MCC 8-4-080 Definitions – Assault defined – Mandatory sentence.
(2) There is hereby created the offense of assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped. A person commits assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
(Prior code § 193-1.7; Added Coun. J. 4-13-84, p. 6076)
The host of the forum will ultimately decide who should be allowed and who should be banned.
So far, bets are open.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
What about the guys who are placing bets on the winner?
I found nothing in the law that says drivers cannot bet on driver fights.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The law should apply to all including to drivers. If two drivers are assaulting with each other on duty, they both should be in prison for at least 90 days.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Does this apply to driver-on-driver assualt?
Like, what if I go berserk and start wailing on some jerk in the airport staging lot (Midway or O'Hare)?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
ATTENTION UTCC, AUPD, CPTDA legal staff -- Here is a Propose new city law (ex-cons, fake newspaper publishers and editors should stay out of this altogether):
MCC #-#-### *Definitions – Assault on an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER defined – Mandatory sentence.
(#) There is hereby created the offense of assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR. A person commits assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
-wjw-
*It shall become known as Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Olympic Games Initiative on Taxi Safety and Security.
Any volunteers who happen to have the City Council membership in their address book who wants email this out to all 50 of them?
-wjw-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Yup, Assault not Battery, a mandatory 90 days imprisonment.
The case cited by the City in its Motion in the pending injunction suit shows that the City does take seriously actions in fighting crimes beyond the state's Criminal Codes under the home rules.
"A crime consists of two parts: prohibited conduct and a penalty for an infraction. In other words, a prescribed penalty is as necessary to constitute a crime as its definition. A statute that prohibits conduct without a penalty is a nullity."
705 N.E.2d 81
184 Ill.2d 504, 235 Ill.Dec. 468
The CITY OF CHICAGO v. Edwin ROMAN
No. 84268.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Dec. 17, 1998.
_____________________________________
MCC 8-4-080 Definitions – Assault defined – Mandatory sentence.
(2) There is hereby created the offense of assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped. A person commits assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
(Prior code § 193-1.7; Added Coun. J. 4-13-84, p. 6076)
AGAIN let 'em know what you think, want, believe in (ad ask them where to send a donation!):
Committee on Transportation and Public Way
(The Committee on Transportation and Public Way shall have jurisdiction over all matters relating to the Chicago Transit Authority, the subways and the furnishing of public transportation within the City by any and all means of conveyance. The Committee shall have jurisdiction over all orders, ordinances and resolutions affecting street naming and layout, the City map, privileges in public ways, special assessments and matters generally affecting the Bureau of Maps and Plats or other agencies dealing with street and alley patterns and elevations, and the Board of Local Improvements.)
Chairman: Thomas R. Allen
Vice-Chairmen: Rey Suarez
Members: Flores, Dowell, Beale, Balcer, Rugai, Cochran, Carothers, Reboyras, Doherty, Reilly, Levar, Schulter
and all of them:
City of Chicago City Council Members:
Michael R. Zalewski mzalewski@cityofchicago.org
Scott Waguespack ward32@cityofchicago.org
Thomas M. Tunney ward44@cityofchicago.org
JoAnn Thompson joann.thompson@cityofchicago.org
Latasha R. Thomas ward17@cityofchicago.org
Rey Suarez rsuarez@cityofchicago.org
Bernard L. Stone bstone@cityofchicago.org
Daniel S. Solis dsolis@cityofchicago.org
Mary Ann Smith maryann@masmith48.org
Ed H. Smith ehsmith@cityofchicago.org
Helen Shiller ward46@cityofchicago.org
Eugene C. Schulter ward47@cityofchicago.org
Virginia A. Rugai vrugai@cityofchicago.org
Brendan Reilly office@reillyforchicago.com
Ariel E. Reboyras ward30@cityofchicago.org
Toni Preckwinkle tpreckwinkle@cityofchicago.org
John Pope ward10@cityofchicago.org
Frank J. Olivo ward13@cityofchicago.org
Patrick J. O'Connor ward40@cityofchicago.org
Billy Ocasio ward26@cityofchicago.org
Ricardo Munoz rmunoz@cityofchicago.org
Joseph A. Moore jmoore@cityofchicago.org
Emma Mitts emitts@cityofchicago.org
Richard F. Mell rmell@cityofchicago.org
Freddrenna M. Lyle ward06@cityofchicago.org
Patrick J. Levar ward45@cityofchicago.org
Margaret Laurino ward39@cityofchicago.org
Lona Lane WARD18@cityofchicago.org
Sandi Jackson ward07@cityofchicago.org
Michelle A. Harris ward08@cityofchicago.org
Leslie A. Hairston lhairston@cityofchicago.org
Toni Foulkes ward15@cityofchicag.org
Manuel Flores ward01@cityofchicago.org
Robert Fioretti contact@chicago2ndward.com
Pat Dowell ward03@cityofchicago.org
Brian G. Doherty bdoherty@cityofchicago.org
Sharon Denise Dixon Frank.Watkins@cityofchicago.org
Vi Daley vdaley@cityofchicago.org
Rey Colon ward35@cityofchicago.org
Willie Cochran willie.cochran@cityofchicago.org
Isaac Carothers icarothers@cityofchicago.org
George A. Cardenas ward12@cityofchicago.org
Walter Burnett, Jr. wburnett@cityofchicago.org
Edward M. Burke eburke@cityofchicago.org
Howard B. Brookins Jr. ward21@cityofchicago.org
Anthony Beale ward09@cityofchicago.org
William J.P. Banks wbanks@cityofchicago.org
James A. Balcer jbalcer@cityofchicago.org
Carrie M. Austin caustin34@cityofchicago.org
Thomas R. Allen tallen@cityofchicago.org
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
ATTENTION UTCC, AUPD, CPTDA legal staff -- Here is a Propose new city law (ex-cons, fake newspaper publishers and editors should stay out of this altogether):
MCC #-#-### *Definitions – Assault on an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER defined – Mandatory sentence.
(#) There is hereby created the offense of assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR. A person commits assault against an ON-DUTY CAB DRIVER or ON-DUTY LICENSED CHAUFFEUR when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
-wjw-
*It shall become known as Mayor Richard M. Daley’s Olympic Games Initiative on Taxi Safety and Security.
Any volunteers who happen to have the City Council membership in their address book who wants email this out to all 50 of them?
-wjw-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Yup, Assault not Battery, a mandatory 90 days imprisonment.
The case cited by the City in its Motion in the pending injunction suit shows that the City does take seriously actions in fighting crimes beyond the state's Criminal Codes under the home rules.
"A crime consists of two parts: prohibited conduct and a penalty for an infraction. In other words, a prescribed penalty is as necessary to constitute a crime as its definition. A statute that prohibits conduct without a penalty is a nullity."
705 N.E.2d 81
184 Ill.2d 504, 235 Ill.Dec. 468
The CITY OF CHICAGO v. Edwin ROMAN
No. 84268.
Supreme Court of Illinois.
Dec. 17, 1998.
_____________________________________
MCC 8-4-080 Definitions – Assault defined – Mandatory sentence.
(2) There is hereby created the offense of assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped. A person commits assault against the elderly, developmentally disabled, or handicapped when he engages in conduct which places a person as defined above in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery. Upon conviction of this offense, a mandatory sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed, not to be less than 90 days nor more than 180 days.
(Prior code § 193-1.7; Added Coun. J. 4-13-84, p. 6076)
