"Fatlu Hall",
Is Wolf Weiss' "Center for Renters' Rights" is anything like the "CPTDA"? I'd like to hear more about it.
I hope that Wolf Weiss enjoys driving a cab or whatever else he chooses to do full- or part-time. What made you think otherwise?
I didn't receive a high school diploma because I didn't make up the gym classes I missed. I have a GED and some college credits.
It's obvious that you are the one NOT "in the know here".
I have never lived in Lake County. I have never driven a suburban cab. I have never made a statement like that.
You seem to be relying on false hearsay or a faulty memory. Which is it?
When have I ever lied?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Everyone that knows Wolf also knows about the center for renters rights he founded. He and his wife have helped thousands over the last 20 years or so. Even a relative of mine once! Wolf did mention that he attended college in Seattle to me once. This is were the college educated comment came from. It is the truth. I guess its ok for you to enjoy driving but it's not ok for Wolf to enjoy it part time. And of course Mike Foulks was born with a scraggly beard. He hasn't aged like Wolf.
A guy that lives in a hotel isn't looked upon too highly here in Chicago. I'll post an address for you in the North burbs. You stated you also drove a cab up there at one time. Go ahead and lie some more if it makes you feel good. It is starting to look like you were a high school drop out. The only thing you can fire back is that your hotel isn't a felabag and that you needed to know your address in the burbs. It doesn't take a genius to see whos in the know here. Not you.
OLa!
If anythign MDF can certainly be called a "felabag "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Taxi-List/message/49478
The above link shows Mike's great language skills. If one searches this site around this time(Jan-08) he will see Mike's post about his suburban cab driving as well. Were you arrested in the suburban cab Mike? You were tried in Rolling Meadows correct? Plead guilty?
"Fatlu Hall",
You are guilty of lying. I have never driven a suburban taxi, nor have I ever posted any such nonsense anywhere.
I have been arrested several times in my life, but never in a suburban taxi, as I HAVE NEVER DRIVEN A SUBURBAN TAXI!
I have never had a trial in Rolling Meadows.
I see no point in answering any more of your misleading questions if you insist on spreading lies about me.
Thanks for the compliment about my language skills. Too bad you ruin your credibility with your anonymity and your lies.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Taxi-List/message/49478
The above link shows Mike's great language skills. If one searches this site around this time(Jan-0
he will see Mike's post about his suburban cab driving as well. Were you arrested in the suburban cab Mike? You were tried in Rolling Meadows correct? Plead guilty?
That's true - felon Foulks never had a trial. He waiaved the right to a trial when he admitted he was guilty as charged in the information before the court and was convicted of a felony.
Is that double-speak on the part of felon Foulks?
Mr. Nathan,
You are guilty of "double-speak". I never admitted I was "guilty as charged in the information" and a plea of guilt in this case was improper. One can't waive a right to a fair trial if one never has an opportunity to have one.
Perhaps you should more carefully review the entire public record before you come to your erroneous conclusions. Keep in mind that much of the record of this case isn't public.
How can one be wrongfully-convicted without being "convicted", Mr. Nathan?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
That's true - felon Foulks never had a trial. He waiaved the right to a trial when he admitted he was guilty as charged in the information before the court and was convicted of a felony.
Is that double-speak on the part of felon Foulks?
Greetings!
It's "doulethink" and "newspeak" at which you are double-plus-ungood, you Long Eared Enemy of The People.
Did they put a gun to your head and threaten to kill you if you didn't plead guilty and swear by all things good and holy that you would never get a fair trial in this life?
Perk up those long ears and give a good listen.
Bad news boy: When one enters a plea of guilty one's own words convict him. How is that wrongful or improper?
Come on, you helped Ola out of a big mess. Can you help yourself out of being found guilty of double-talk, back-peddling and twisting the facts?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Mr. Nathan,
You are guilty of "double-speak". I never admitted I was "guilty as charged in the information" and a plea of guilt in this case was improper. One can't waive a right to a fair trial if one never has an opportunity to have one.
Perhaps you should more carefully review the entire public record before you come to your erroneous conclusions. Keep in mind that much of the record of this case isn't public.
How can one be wrongfully-convicted without being "convicted", Mr. Nathan?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
That's true - felon Foulks never had a trial. He waiaved the right to a trial when he admitted he was guilty as charged in the information before the court and was convicted of a felony.
Is that double-speak on the part of felon Foulks?
his own words have convicted him already
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Greetings!
It's "doulethink" and "newspeak" at which you are double-plus-ungood, you Long Eared Enemy of The People.
Did they put a gun to your head and threaten to kill you if you didn't plead guilty and swear by all things good and holy that you would never get a fair trial in this life?
Perk up those long ears and give a good listen.
Bad news boy: When one enters a plea of guilty one's own words convict him. How is that wrongful or improper?
Come on, you helped Ola out of a big mess. Can you help yourself out of being found guilty of double-talk, back-peddling and twisting the facts?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Mr. Nathan,
You are guilty of "double-speak". I never admitted I was "guilty as charged in the information" and a plea of guilt in this case was improper. One can't waive a right to a fair trial if one never has an opportunity to have one.
Perhaps you should more carefully review the entire public record before you come to your erroneous conclusions. Keep in mind that much of the record of this case isn't public.
How can one be wrongfully-convicted without being "convicted", Mr. Nathan?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
That's true - felon Foulks never had a trial. He waiaved the right to a trial when he admitted he was guilty as charged in the information before the court and was convicted of a felony.
Is that double-speak on the part of felon Foulks?
A judge isn't going to give you a sentence of 30 days in the House of Corrections and 24 months of felony probation because she likes your good looks. Either you had a trial and you were found guilty after the evidence was weighed by a fact-finder or you waived a trial and entered a plea of guilty. Stop the bullroar. There's no in-between.
If you vomit out the facts, we'll understand what you are saying - MAYBE. Otherwise, we'll just have to assume you're a liar - a tale spinner - a bull artist - a fluff specialist, etc.
One way or another, you are a convicted felon and this was based on your admitted guilty plea, correct?
OLA, ALL.
MDF: If [Wolf Weiss] is so successful, why would he need a "second job as a driver"?
WJW: Duh! SUCCESS isn't necessarily measured in DOLLARS. I can understand how anyone who would try to extort $125,000 does not understand that simple whole truth.
MDF: What college did Wolf Weiss graduate from? What field is his degree in?
WJW: Shouldn’t you be asking me directly. No one is authorized to release that information. Those questions remind me of the pun about the farmer who was recognized to be out standing in his field…. My education and experience is immaterial and NOYB – ok, Major in English & American Literature and Poetry, double minor in German Literature& Poetry.
Additional training, education/experience in mining demolition & explosives chemistry and shall remain private and undisclosed except to Ola Shalom – just kidding, I don’t even know Ola except when he is disguised as MDF. My other work experience is in advertising and marketing communications with specialization in financial and legal services and print production. (Don’t tell George, he night try to recruit me or something.)
MDF: I can't contest Wolf Weiss' "appearance at all times" as I hardly ever see the man.
WJW: I look like the Werewolf of London in werewolf state most of the time.
MDF: His part-time status makes that more understandable now.
WJW: My “status” is “two-full-time jobs, which leaves me enough time to tear anyone who asks for it a “new one.” (Werewolves don’t sleep!)
MDF: I don't feel the need to tell lies or half-truths ….
WJW: (Then why do you do it?) Please list any and all the alleged “half-truths” you have found. They may be worth something! I am very good at assessing (sorry for the “ass” reference) “half-truths.” And I know you have great difficulty in discerning which is which.
MDF: I am living much better and happier than most people on the planet, as a matter of fact. I am one of the [minorities of] cabdrivers who actually choose to drive a taxi for a living because I enjoy it.
WJW: Ignorance is bliss. . Mediocrity is its own reward.
MDF: Dreams are nice, but reality is nicer.
WJW: DOUBLETHINK can strike anyone, anytime.
MDF: Maybe you could start by talking to Ola Shalom at Carriage cab and see what he has to say about me.
WJW: I have never had the pleasure to see or speak to a phantom. I saw a UFO one time and the driver looked a lot like MDF but with much longer ears. This is a whole truth but only half-baked.
MDF: I am certain [Ola Shalom has] got no idea who Wolf Weiss or "Fatlu Hall" is, nor does he care.
WJW: I am certain I have no idea who Mike D. Foulks or “Luke Miskof” is nor does anyone (except Ola) care. Everybody knows Ola is Mike's alter ego, although it has been suggested that Ola is George in drag.
SHALOM ALL.
ola
you mean decor
this is an on-line asylum
doctor george designed it
some of us are the doctors and nurses
some of us are the patients
some of us are the vistors
come in
make yourself comfortable
get to know us all
shalom
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
dear posters on this website:
i and my fellow members of the UTCC would like to put out another call for decorum and respect on this website. it does none of us any good for anyone to be involved in name-calling, or casting aspersions on each others' character on here. the main result is that people who might be inclined to participate here end up avoiding it like the plague, as it features so much distasteful discourse. i myself avoid reading things here regularly for this very reason, though it does fall within my duties as secretary to track sites like this.
one particular recent thread i would like to mention that we have a particular aversion to does not consist of actual name-calling. this is the one that mentions a cabdriver's record with the criminal justice system. we feel that calling any attention at all to this kind of information as a way of criticiziing a person is totally uncalled for. we find it unfair and abhorrent, besides being irrelevant to any of the issues facing us cabdrivers that are addressed here. we want to state here clearly that we ARE not, nor WILL we be, a party to this kind of character-assassination.
peter enger, secretary, UTCC
Mr. enger has a truly great gift for tongue-in-cheek humor.
How many "as"ses did he use in his wonderful call for common sense and decency?
A true Master of The Sublime!
I salute you for wisdom and your wit!
Thanks for bringing a little light into this dark, bluer-than-jailhouse-blues corner for the cyber-spacy and profoundly absurd.
As you well know, this couldn't be happening in the real world of physical(and cosmic)law! It just couldn't, could it?
((Like you didn't know this was not a serious place for discussion of actual issues! Be careful they can ban people for telling the truth around here.......))
-ww-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
dear posters on this website:
i and my fellow members of the UTCC would like to put out another call for decorum and respect on this website. it does none of us any good for anyone to be involved in name-calling, or casting aspersions on each others' character on here. the main result is that people who might be inclined to participate here end up avoiding it like the plague, as it features so much distasteful discourse. i myself avoid reading things here regularly for this very reason, though it does fall within my duties as secretary to track sites like this.
one particular recent thread i would like to mention that we have a particular aversion to does not consist of actual name-calling. this is the one that mentions a cabdriver's record with the criminal justice system. we feel that calling any attention at all to this kind of information as a way of criticiziing a person is totally uncalled for. we find it unfair and abhorrent, besides being irrelevant to any of the issues facing us cabdrivers that are addressed here. we want to state here clearly that we ARE not, nor WILL we be, a party to this kind of character-assassination.
peter enger, secretary, UTCC
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
"Fatlu Hall",
I use my real name every time I post.
Ola Shalom is a real cabdriver who leases from Carriage.
How would you suggest I "produce" him?
Any current cabdriver can declare himself a candidate for the next CCO election scheduled for this November at any time.
I have never run "unopposed" in any election.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
INSTANT "TRUTHINESS" ANALSIS (ITA):
MF: I use my real name every time I post.
ITA: So what. How does that make one more honest, credible, truthful or believable? It does none of these. It certainly indicates a high level of egomania, narcissism and a neediness for recognition.
He uses his real name every time he posts his lies.
The use of pen names has been meticulously presented in a detailed account of the tradition in literature, in modern electronic communications and with historical facts on this very same forum.
The preteder just ignores it though, as he does most other relevent facts and information that do not support or defend his delusions and lies and fantasies.
A pen name is like a safety shield - it allows for free expression without fear of being attacked by out-of-control, amoral, unethical, dirt-slinging liars and con artists.
There is no valid reason for anyone to use his or her real name. Only a self-serving egomaniac might insist on such a silly stricture, probably because the egomaniac does not understand why anyone would not want to draw attention to him or herself at every opportunity even if it means telling a lie and repeating over and over and over again, spreading it like raw sewage gushing out of the toilet.
MF: Ola Shalom is a real cabdriver who leases from Carriage.
ITA: Where's the proof. Where's the beef? Where's the Ola? I challenge anyone to go to the garage and ask around. "Is Ola here?" Have you seen Ola? Did Ola come in today? Blank stares is all one can get. Puzzled looks. "Maybe he's over at Yellow - we don't know any Ola here."
MF: How would you suggest I "produce" him?
ITA: Can he pull him out of your head, where he lives?
MF: Any current cabdriver can declare himself a candidate for the next CCO election scheduled for this November at any time.
ITA: There is no CCO that's just a figment of the pretenders' empty head. A real 'election' is subject to independent review and verification, otherwise it is just as much a shame as the CC non-o.
MF: I have never run "unopposed" in any election.
ITA: Well, in real time and space, he has never run against anyone other than the figments between his ears. (Avoid the temptation about ears!)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"Fatlu Hall",
I use my real name every time I post.
Ola Shalom is a real cabdriver who leases from Carriage.
How would you suggest I "produce" him?
Any current cabdriver can declare himself a candidate for the next CCO election scheduled for this November at any time.
I have never run "unopposed" in any election.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
Ola. {Hello.} (1)
Mike's Trail of Lies and deceit leads right back to his own little stable, errr, I mean garage.
Shalom. (Peace be with you!) (2)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"Fatlu Hall",
I use my real name every time I post.
Ola Shalom is a real cabdriver who leases from Carriage.
How would you suggest I "produce" him?
Any current cabdriver can declare himself a candidate for the next CCO election scheduled for this November at any time.
I have never run "unopposed" in any election.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
His following is well documented? where in his own newsletter? I heard they only had 8 people at there last big demonstration.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
seven were figments
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
His following is well documented? where in his own newsletter? I heard they only had 8 people at there last big demonstration.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Peter Enger is to be judged by his current work and not his looks. While Peter is always bathed, his appearance might lead some to not take him seriously. His current work is to be applauded. His following is well documented. Between the Mag Seven and the UTCC taking action there is currently hope for us. I too have seen the red stickers inside cabs other than my own. I obtained mine from a UTCC affiliated driver at O'Hare. We all should post one.
Mike F is different. He talks a good game at first, but the CC-0 only exists between his own ears. I have yet to see one driver tell me he is aligned with Mike F. I find it had to believe there is a REAL Ola Shalom that has been helped by Mike. A quick look at the CC-0 site leads me to believe almost all of the posts there are penned by Mike F. No one that posts there claims to be a CC-0 member. Even the so called Ola isn't a member according to Mike and Mike cannot produce him. While Mike says he posted complete election results, I only saw partial results. These were posted several weeks after the so called election. Mike said he needed to make sure the electants wanted to participate first. Here's an idea: why not let people declare themselves in the election a week or so before it is held. That way Mike can win like the late Sadaam always did. Unopposed.
Mr. D Foulks has his own chat forum (well regulated and maintained). He would better listen to you and respond to you more respectfully (e.g. no name callings or any kinds), and he welcomes you and your intelligent thoughts.
The difference is that you won't be tortured, wasted from your time, and "harassed" any more.
The choice is always yours!
Any additional motions for the board to consider and reconsider?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Mr. enger has a truly great gift for tongue-in-cheek humor.
How many "as"ses did he use in his wonderful call for common sense and decency?
A true Master of The Sublime!
I salute you for wisdom and your wit!
Thanks for bringing a little light into this dark, bluer-than-jailhouse-blues corner for the cyber-spacy and profoundly absurd.
As you well know, this couldn't be happening in the real world of physical(and cosmic)law! It just couldn't, could it?
((Like you didn't know this was not a serious place for discussion of actual issues! Be careful they can ban people for telling the truth around here.......))
-ww-
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
dear posters on this website:
i and my fellow members of the UTCC would like to put out another call for decorum and respect on this website. it does none of us any good for anyone to be involved in name-calling, or casting aspersions on each others' character on here. the main result is that people who might be inclined to participate here end up avoiding it like the plague, as it features so much distasteful discourse. i myself avoid reading things here regularly for this very reason, though it does fall within my duties as secretary to track sites like this.
one particular recent thread i would like to mention that we have a particular aversion to does not consist of actual name-calling. this is the one that mentions a cabdriver's record with the criminal justice system. we feel that calling any attention at all to this kind of information as a way of criticiziing a person is totally uncalled for. we find it unfair and abhorrent, besides being irrelevant to any of the issues facing us cabdrivers that are addressed here. we want to state here clearly that we ARE not, nor WILL we be, a party to this kind of character-assassination.
peter enger, secretary, UTCC
The gist of this thread isn't intended to offend you or anyone else affiliated with the UTCC. I do hope you are not going to take umbrage with my responses to felon Foulks and his verbal assaults. Read them over carefully, please.
I am not trying to assassinate Foulks for being a felon. But do keep in mind that he tries to call my credibility into question without any basis for it while doing so with a history of a felony conviction. Granted, he's not John Wayne Gacy. But who knows what it was he was charged with originally? Remember, Peter, it was a PLEA BARGAIN.
What kind of heinous crime did the original information allege? HE WON'T TELL US WHAT HE WAS CHARGED WITH. At least he won't yet. Maybe the facts will come out. Maybe the cabdrivers in the CCO will even want to know the truth. At least the ones in the UTCC ought to have some interest.
Ola everyone!
Well dog my cats! I can smell a charlatan even in cyberspace. Snif snif snif. Donkey breath?
Speaking of Foulks who has been proven GUILTY over and over again on this forum of being a liar:
Nothing can stop him from disrespcting others because he has no self-respect. This comes from his intimate knowledge and understanding of Jailhouse Rules of Conduct.
He has no respect for the real law and he hates it when others seem to be making real progress and succeeding where he continually fails.
When he is totally desperate for attention he steals others' words and posts on other forums. You can post a criticism here and now and a few months later it will appear on another forum as his statement about the very person who posted here about him.
*Erie-ly familiar sounding name? I use fake names whenever I feel like it - especially when I go for the truth.
Shalom to ya' all.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The gist of this thread isn't intended to offend you or anyone else affiliated with the UTCC. I do hope you are not going to take umbrage with my responses to felon Foulks and his verbal assaults. Read them over carefully, please.
I am not trying to assassinate Foulks for being a felon. But do keep in mind that he tries to call my credibility into question without any basis for it while doing so with a history of a felony conviction. Granted, he's not John Wayne Gacy. But who knows what it was he was charged with originally? Remember, Peter, it was a PLEA BARGAIN.
What kind of heinous crime did the original information allege? HE WON'T TELL US WHAT HE WAS CHARGED WITH. At least he won't yet. Maybe the facts will come out. Maybe the cabdrivers in the CCO will even want to know the truth. At least the ones in the UTCC ought to have some interest.
"When he is totally desperate for attention he steals others' words and posts on other forums. You can post a criticism here and now and a few months later it will appear on another forum as his statement about the very person who posted here about him."
Mike called Don a "schoolgirl" just like Wolf who called the teamsters "schoolgirls" when they dropped us like hot potatoes and ran from the mayor.
GUILTY AGAIN. Once a con always a con.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Ola everyone!
Well dog my cats! I can smell a charlatan even in cyberspace. Snif snif snif. Donkey breath?
Speaking of Foulks who has been proven GUILTY over and over again on this forum of being a liar:
Nothing can stop him from disrespcting others because he has no self-respect. This comes from his intimate knowledge and understanding of Jailhouse Rules of Conduct.
He has no respect for the real law and he hates it when others seem to be making real progress and succeeding where he continually fails.
When he is totally desperate for attention he steals others' words and posts on other forums. You can post a criticism here and now and a few months later it will appear on another forum as his statement about the very person who posted here about him.
*Erie-ly familiar sounding name? I use fake names whenever I feel like it - especially when I go for the truth.
Shalom to ya' all.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The gist of this thread isn't intended to offend you or anyone else affiliated with the UTCC. I do hope you are not going to take umbrage with my responses to felon Foulks and his verbal assaults. Read them over carefully, please.
I am not trying to assassinate Foulks for being a felon. But do keep in mind that he tries to call my credibility into question without any basis for it while doing so with a history of a felony conviction. Granted, he's not John Wayne Gacy. But who knows what it was he was charged with originally? Remember, Peter, it was a PLEA BARGAIN.
What kind of heinous crime did the original information allege? HE WON'T TELL US WHAT HE WAS CHARGED WITH. At least he won't yet. Maybe the facts will come out. Maybe the cabdrivers in the CCO will even want to know the truth. At least the ones in the UTCC ought to have some interest.
OOO LA LA!
Calling Mr. Wolf a liar does not make him one.
He HOWLES, (A-OOOOOOOOO like the Werewolf of London) but he does not lie.
When he calls you a liar he provides proof. All you do (mike D. Foulks)is make noise. They are right you make this sound: HEE-HAW, HEE-HAW.
Here is the court tape of MDF's GUILTY PLEA: "HEE-HAW, HEE-HAWHEE-HAW, HEE-HAW HEE-HAW, Mr. Judge your Honor."
sorry Wolf, I got the name first and am the first to use it. I stole it off of mike's post. so what is he gonna do about it, tell his Parole Officer or something?
-Pretentious Crank
(and a hearty shalom to you all!)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"When he is totally desperate for attention he steals others' words and posts on other forums. You can post a criticism here and now and a few months later it will appear on another forum as his statement about the very person who posted here about him."
Mike called Don a "schoolgirl" just like Wolf who called the teamsters "schoolgirls" when they dropped us like hot potatoes and ran from the mayor.
GUILTY AGAIN. Once a con always a con.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Ola everyone!
Well dog my cats! I can smell a charlatan even in cyberspace. Snif snif snif. Donkey breath?
Speaking of Foulks who has been proven GUILTY over and over again on this forum of being a liar:
Nothing can stop him from disrespcting others because he has no self-respect. This comes from his intimate knowledge and understanding of Jailhouse Rules of Conduct.
He has no respect for the real law and he hates it when others seem to be making real progress and succeeding where he continually fails.
When he is totally desperate for attention he steals others' words and posts on other forums. You can post a criticism here and now and a few months later it will appear on another forum as his statement about the very person who posted here about him.
*Erie-ly familiar sounding name? I use fake names whenever I feel like it - especially when I go for the truth.
Shalom to ya' all.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The gist of this thread isn't intended to offend you or anyone else affiliated with the UTCC. I do hope you are not going to take umbrage with my responses to felon Foulks and his verbal assaults. Read them over carefully, please.
I am not trying to assassinate Foulks for being a felon. But do keep in mind that he tries to call my credibility into question without any basis for it while doing so with a history of a felony conviction. Granted, he's not John Wayne Gacy. But who knows what it was he was charged with originally? Remember, Peter, it was a PLEA BARGAIN.
What kind of heinous crime did the original information allege? HE WON'T TELL US WHAT HE WAS CHARGED WITH. At least he won't yet. Maybe the facts will come out. Maybe the cabdrivers in the CCO will even want to know the truth. At least the ones in the UTCC ought to have some interest.
