"Clueless", or should I say, Yi Tang,
YOU SHOULDN'T!
I could tell you much more about the telephone harassment case which fascinates you.
WHY COULDN'T YOU?
But, what would be the point?
SO YOU CAN START TO TELL THE "TRUTH" IN YOUR OWN VERSION, CAN'T YOU?
You and others have already distorted the public records available about this case.
HOW SO? BE SPECIFIC.
Even if you did "feel sorry for me", what good would that do?
SO YOU MAY START TO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN BATTLE, IF IT WAS INDEED A "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
Is that your idea of "fighting injustice"?
YES, STARTING FROM YOURSELF, IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY "WRONG" SOMEWHERE.
"Feel sorry" for the victims?
THE REAL VICTIM WAS YOUR MOTHER WHO POSTED THE "BAIL" FOR YOU. $5000 WAS A LOT FOR HER.
No wonder you have had such little success with cabdrivers.
MY SUCCESS OR NOT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
What years did you drive a Chicago cab?
Why don't you drive a Chicago cab anymore?
AGAIN, WOULD IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENT IN YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION CASES?
-Mike Foulks
MICHAEL D. FOULKS IS YOUR REAL NAME
So, "Clueless", if you aren't Yi Tang, then who are you?
Why won't you post using your real name?
You've distorted the public record with this very post:
Bail was $4000, not $5000.
This clearly shows how you mistate or exagerrate the public record against me.
You would likely do the same with any further explanation.
There's no point in explaining anything to you.
You have deliberately used a name other than your own and you refer to me incorrectly. You spread misinformation about me.
You are simply a pest.
This is why you aren't successful with Chicago cabdrivers.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"Clueless", or should I say, Yi Tang,
YOU SHOULDN'T!
I could tell you much more about the telephone harassment case which fascinates you.
WHY COULDN'T YOU?
But, what would be the point?
SO YOU CAN START TO TELL THE "TRUTH" IN YOUR OWN VERSION, CAN'T YOU?
You and others have already distorted the public records available about this case.
HOW SO? BE SPECIFIC.
Even if you did "feel sorry for me", what good would that do?
SO YOU MAY START TO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN BATTLE, IF IT WAS INDEED A "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
Is that your idea of "fighting injustice"?
YES, STARTING FROM YOURSELF, IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY "WRONG" SOMEWHERE.
"Feel sorry" for the victims?
THE REAL VICTIM WAS YOUR MOTHER WHO POSTED THE "BAIL" FOR YOU. $5000 WAS A LOT FOR HER.
No wonder you have had such little success with cabdrivers.
MY SUCCESS OR NOT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
What years did you drive a Chicago cab?
Why don't you drive a Chicago cab anymore?
AGAIN, WOULD IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENT IN YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION CASES?
-Mike Foulks
MICHAEL D. FOULKS IS YOUR REAL NAME
Why did you have to bother your mother for this?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
So, "Clueless", if you aren't Yi Tang, then who are you?
Why won't you post using your real name?
You've distorted the public record with this very post:
Bail was $4000, not $5000.
This clearly shows how you mistate or exagerrate the public record against me.
You would likely do the same with any further explanation.
There's no point in explaining anything to you.
You have deliberately used a name other than your own and you refer to me incorrectly. You spread misinformation about me.
You are simply a pest.
This is why you aren't successful with Chicago cabdrivers.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"Clueless", or should I say, Yi Tang,
YOU SHOULDN'T!
I could tell you much more about the telephone harassment case which fascinates you.
WHY COULDN'T YOU?
But, what would be the point?
SO YOU CAN START TO TELL THE "TRUTH" IN YOUR OWN VERSION, CAN'T YOU?
You and others have already distorted the public records available about this case.
HOW SO? BE SPECIFIC.
Even if you did "feel sorry for me", what good would that do?
SO YOU MAY START TO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN BATTLE, IF IT WAS INDEED A "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
Is that your idea of "fighting injustice"?
YES, STARTING FROM YOURSELF, IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY "WRONG" SOMEWHERE.
"Feel sorry" for the victims?
THE REAL VICTIM WAS YOUR MOTHER WHO POSTED THE "BAIL" FOR YOU. $5000 WAS A LOT FOR HER.
No wonder you have had such little success with cabdrivers.
MY SUCCESS OR NOT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
What years did you drive a Chicago cab?
Why don't you drive a Chicago cab anymore?
AGAIN, WOULD IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENT IN YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION CASES?
-Mike Foulks
MICHAEL D. FOULKS IS YOUR REAL NAME
Clueless, or should I say, Yi Tang,
Because I didn't have $4000 cash (10% of $40,000) when wrongly charged, for one. The other reasons are private.
The details of the relationships between members of my family are none of your business.
If you think that having one's father or mother bail one out of jail is unusual enough to comment on, feel free.
If you can't keep a simple fact like the amount of my bond correct, I see no point in answering any more of your questions.
You apparently have access to the public record. Much of the record is not accessible to the public. I can't and won't explain why until it is, if ever.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Why did you have to bother your mother for this?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
So, "Clueless", if you aren't Yi Tang, then who are you?
Why won't you post using your real name?
You've distorted the public record with this very post:
Bail was $4000, not $5000.
This clearly shows how you mistate or exagerrate the public record against me.
You would likely do the same with any further explanation.
There's no point in explaining anything to you.
You have deliberately used a name other than your own and you refer to me incorrectly. You spread misinformation about me.
You are simply a pest.
This is why you aren't successful with Chicago cabdrivers.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
"Clueless", or should I say, Yi Tang,
YOU SHOULDN'T!
I could tell you much more about the telephone harassment case which fascinates you.
WHY COULDN'T YOU?
But, what would be the point?
SO YOU CAN START TO TELL THE "TRUTH" IN YOUR OWN VERSION, CAN'T YOU?
You and others have already distorted the public records available about this case.
HOW SO? BE SPECIFIC.
Even if you did "feel sorry for me", what good would that do?
SO YOU MAY START TO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN BATTLE, IF IT WAS INDEED A "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
Is that your idea of "fighting injustice"?
YES, STARTING FROM YOURSELF, IF THERE HAS BEEN ANY "WRONG" SOMEWHERE.
"Feel sorry" for the victims?
THE REAL VICTIM WAS YOUR MOTHER WHO POSTED THE "BAIL" FOR YOU. $5000 WAS A LOT FOR HER.
No wonder you have had such little success with cabdrivers.
MY SUCCESS OR NOT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION.
What years did you drive a Chicago cab?
Why don't you drive a Chicago cab anymore?
AGAIN, WOULD IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENT IN YOUR "WRONGFUL" CONVICTION CASES?
-Mike Foulks
MICHAEL D. FOULKS IS YOUR REAL NAME
One that wants to be president has to make full disclosure.
Same thing I asked too. Does he subscribe to tell 100 lies and perhaps some will believe one?
Mr. Nathan is easily capable of reaching the issues. The place to do it is at Baba Palace tomorrow at 2:00 P.M. Come to the "Unity Meeting". Let's discuss issues live where it counts..
See posting to thread above.
