In defense of George Lutfallah, I'm sure he didn't know of Mikes criminal background when he was publically backing Mike. There was also recently another guy that had many fooled into thinking he was a great hero. One we should be proud to call one of our own. This so called hero had committed crimes against us drivers and also federal ones in the past. He was caught and terminated from his assocaition. These are facts that George was given my sources to. George didn't know of this until after his paper was published.
George is allowed to fall for these gold plated con men just like most of us do from time to time. He's human. I for one just ask George to act with the knowledge in hand at the time. Or in other words keep in mind what he is in the know about when he speaks.
Why this post should be removed:
1. It refers to Richard Lang, who this poster has suggested "cheated drivers" by breaking some kind of law.
1A. I can't determine anything by these allegations other than this poster is trying to defame Mr. Lang anonymously.
2. It is anonymous.
3. It suggest that George Lutfallah "publicly backed me". George Lutfallah has never "publicly backed me".
Please remove this post. If the poster wishes to go "on record" to make a claim against Mr. Lang, he should do so using his real name so he can be held accountable.
Thank you.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
In defense of George Lutfallah, I'm sure he didn't know of Mikes criminal background when he was publically backing Mike. There was also recently another guy that had many fooled into thinking he was a great hero. One we should be proud to call one of our own. This so called hero had committed crimes against us drivers and also federal ones in the past. He was caught and terminated from his assocaition. These are facts that George was given my sources to. George didn't know of this until after his paper was published.
George is allowed to fall for these gold plated con men just like most of us do from time to time. He's human. I for one just ask George to act with the knowledge in hand at the time. Or in other words keep in mind what he is in the know about when he speaks.
I wonder if George Lutfallah is going to bite at having Foulks make determinations as to what gets cut out of the Forum of the Dispatcher? Should a convicted felon be the one to make those policy decisions? I say even if he's right in his suggestions, he's wrong for doing so. Felon Foulks should confine his thoughts to industry issues and leave the First Amendment decisions to others who might be more appropriate people to make such calls.
Donald Nathan
Mr. Nathan,
Thanks for yet another misleading comment...not!
I am asking the regular contributors here to support George Lutfallah if he deletes an anonymous post based on the objectionable reference to the objector.
I am not "determing forum policy". I haven't even spoken to Mr. Lutfallah about it.
I am trying to see where you all stand on this issue.
It is obvious to me that "Clueless" is Mr. Tang. Why can't he post using his real name?
I suspect that "Big Fat Mouth" is Pankaj Kapoor.
People who are disrupting serious discussion of the issues should be responsible for their comments.
Do you agree, Mr. Nathan?
A simple YES or NO.
There's nothing about my wrongful conviction which prevents me from making appropriate comments about this issue.
Please explain otherwise, if only to give you a chance to use "Felon" and "Foulks" in the same sentence.
Are you aware that pretty much everyone who might care is well aware that I am a "felon", however wrongfully-convicetd?
So am I right in my suggestions?
How can I be "wrong" for doing so?
You are still a "schmuck", Mr. Nathan.
Don't tell me how to "confine" my thoughts or comments, you meddling schmuck.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
I wonder if George Lutfallah is going to bite at having Foulks make determinations as to what gets cut out of the Forum of the Dispatcher? Should a convicted felon be the one to make those policy decisions? I say even if he's right in his suggestions, he's wrong for doing so. Felon Foulks should confine his thoughts to industry issues and leave the First Amendment decisions to others who might be more appropriate people to make such calls.
Donald Nathan
1) George was given my sources. He now knows what I have posted is true.
2) I am going to send George a copy of Mr. Foulks felony sentence from the official records I obtained from the court system. It clearly shows a 24 month mental health probation tacked onto the end of the incarceration time.
3) I would like to hear from George himself that he has never publically backed you. Look at my next post that will contain a public backing from George.
Subject: The new CCO Web site
Name: George Lutfallah
Date Posted: Jun 21, 08 - 8:49 PM
Email: george@chicagodispatcher.com
Message: Nice site Mike. I look forward to checking it frequently. Let me know if there's anything the Chicago Dispatcher or I can do to support you.
Regards,
George Lutfallah
Chicago Dispatcher
Mike you are the real phony. The post above came from your own website. I think the word jerk is in the dictionary.
"Big Fat Mouth",
Phony? From the guy who won't post his real name, that's a laugh.
George Lutfallah has never publicly supported me.
You call that "support"?
"Let me know if there's anything the Chicago Dispatcher or I can do to support you."
What was "done" to "support (me)"?
He made an offer of non-specific "support" which I never responded to or used, so whatever "support" you are imagining has never been defined.
"Jerk"?
Come on, Pankaj Kapoor can do better than "jerk".
Why don't you try first to define my "phoniness"?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: The new CCO Web site
Name: George Lutfallah
Date Posted: Jun 21, 08 - 8:49 PM
Email: george@chicagodispatcher.com
Message: Nice site Mike. I look forward to checking it frequently. Let me know if there's anything the Chicago Dispatcher or I can do to support you.
Regards,
George Lutfallah
Chicago Dispatcher
Mike you are the real phony. The post above came from your own website. I think the word jerk is in the dictionary.
"Big Fat Mouth",
What did you post was true?
If it isn't true, why should I have to spend my time proving it untrue, and then you have no responsibility for misleading people or wasting my time?
If what you post is so "true", why must you hide behind a fake name?
If those courts documents have "scrambled victim info", how did you "unscramble it"?
You are a liar, Mr. "Big Fat Mouth".
You are also a coward.
How does George Lutfallah even know that the court documents you are sending are valid copies?
There's nothing "tacked onto" the end of the "incarceration time".
I'm actually glad you are making such a big deal about this.
How can a judge sentence someone to "24-month mental health probation" who doesn't have a mental illness?
Maybe a judge who doesn't follow proper procedures?
I would love to hear Mr. Nathan's "expert" explanation of such an injustice.
I am asking George Lutfallah to remove these posts because they are made anonymously, they provide misleading information, and they are distracting from serious discussion about the issues.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
1) George was given my sources. He now knows what I have posted is true.
2) I am going to send George a copy of Mr. Foulks felony sentence from the official records I obtained from the court system. It clearly shows a 24 month mental health probation tacked onto the end of the incarceration time.
3) I would like to hear from George himself that he has never publically backed you. Look at my next post that will contain a public backing from George.
Felon Foulks claims his guilty plea was wrung out of him unjustly. He CLAIMS he got shunted into a 24 month probation that included a "mental" although he's clean as a whistle between the ears --- LOL. He flaps his wings about how Judge Tobin violated procedures and did this and that and should be defrocked and yadda, yadda, yadda.
Where's the beef?
I've got the bits and snatches of the record at this point. But it's still not clear whether there really is an appeal going on. Is there? I think the cabdriver community deserves to know. After all, Felon Foulks attacks everyone who doesn't have a felony recond. He loves to go for the short hairs of everyone who never was arrested for ANYTHING, much less on felony charges.
I think it's high time Felon Foulks come forth. Come on Mike - vomit it out. Your stomach will feel better when the truth is out there. What's the court number on appeal? With that we can track the progress of it. We'll wish you well in your efforts to clear your name. But until you prove yourself innocent after pleading guilty to felony charges, we're going to presume you guilty of a felony as you were charged.
A lousy, stinking low-life felon.
Stop attacking everyone in the taxi industry, felon. You have no right to be the attacker. You are scum from the sewer. Whether people use their names or not, you have no right to attack them.
Donald Nathan
Mr. Nathan, "Director of the CPTDA",
I won't even give you the time of day.
You are a lawyer. You want the Appellate Docket number? Go get it, if you can.
Maybe it's part of the "missing pages" of the court file?
I never "flapped my wings" about having Judge Tobin "defrocked".
Ms. Tobin stepped down from the bench very shortly after her last involvement with this case.
If she hadn't, I would have expected her to be doing nothing but marriage ceremonies right now.
I haven't "attacked everyone in the taxi industry", Mr. Nathan.
Are you "everyone"?
"lousy, stinking low-life"?
"scum from the sewer"?
Are these terms you learned in law school, Mr. Nathan?
Or are you just passing on the "compliments" you have received as a lawyer for the fleet owners and insurance companies over the years?
Okay, Mr. Nathan, I shouldn't be so mean to you after all:
It's 9:30 AM. Now, begone lawyer-fool!
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Felon Foulks claims his guilty plea was wrung out of him unjustly. He CLAIMS he got shunted into a 24 month probation that included a "mental" although he's clean as a whistle between the ears --- LOL. He flaps his wings about how Judge Tobin violated procedures and did this and that and should be defrocked and yadda, yadda, yadda.
Where's the beef?
I've got the bits and snatches of the record at this point. But it's still not clear whether there really is an appeal going on. Is there? I think the cabdriver community deserves to know. After all, Felon Foulks attacks everyone who doesn't have a felony recond. He loves to go for the short hairs of everyone who never was arrested for ANYTHING, much less on felony charges.
I think it's high time Felon Foulks come forth. Come on Mike - vomit it out. Your stomach will feel better when the truth is out there. What's the court number on appeal? With that we can track the progress of it. We'll wish you well in your efforts to clear your name. But until you prove yourself innocent after pleading guilty to felony charges, we're going to presume you guilty of a felony as you were charged.
A lousy, stinking low-life felon.
Stop attacking everyone in the taxi industry, felon. You have no right to be the attacker. You are scum from the sewer. Whether people use their names or not, you have no right to attack them.
Donald Nathan
Why would I ask the time of day from a felon, Foulks? I wouldn't be able to rely on the answer.
Donald Nathan
