George, Peter ask you the interview and whatever reason you do not say yes to have an interview. The meaning is 'No'. Am I wrong?
Let me strait ask you one thing. When we UTCC have a rally for safety placard in front of DCS, your Jonathan Bullington came there. Do you know what he did? Ofcause you know very well what he did.
But to clarify what he did, I will tell you in here. Jonathan Bullington came to our rally and press confrence.And he take a picture like a creep as he did before the rally of Mr Chen case.
And then, he did not interview with any body of taxi driver at that place.
It was very strange to me, and other drivers.
(When I saw picture for your ghost meeting, I aware Jonathan Bullington have a skill for picture as large number of people in the meeting can change a few people attendee, but a few people attendee can not change to large number. What a great his picture skill!)
What Jonathan Bullington make a news for our rally in your news paper? You know it what you order to Jonathan Bullington.You try to broke our effort for the safety issue of all taxi driver with writing of Commissioner's interview.
You may ask me what's the wrong of that news in your paper.
Here is the answered question with my kindness.So you should make a answer to understand what did you wrong.
1. Do you and Jonathan Bullington know what is the law for safety placard?
2. If you and Jonathan Bullington know it, why you did not ask to commissioner like " Law is clear" and her comment do not proper. But you and Jonathan Bullinton didn't do it. Because you do not want to see anything about UTCC's successful action, even that was right work for Taxi driver of IL.
3. If you and Jonathan Bullington do not know about the safety placard by law, then you should not make a news with improper information, even it was through interview from commisioner. Because you and Jonathan Bullington should not do such kinds of news without knowlegde for safety placard which is mandatory to bring in public vehecle by law.
The both way you did is wrong and guilty to every taxi driver. Because you do not infrom them what is the truth and fact.
As I said you have a gun which fire to all of taxi driver, but your target is wrong. Without knowledge for the fact, I told you that kinds of action is very harmful to taxi driver who try to live with current difficult situation.
To return the subject peter's interview for you, it is simple you do not have a interview with peter.So Peter gave you a chance to protect yourself, but anyhow you reject it. That is what you wrote in here.
But I believe Peter will make sure the story very fair to everybody, not like you did to UTCC. Peter fail to have a interview with you, but he will have an interview with person who attended in your meeting.So His sincere action is better than Jonathan Bullinton and you. One more thing; Peter gave you one more chance to clarify the meeting of yours by yourself in this forum again. How he is so nice person(you and jonathan bullinton did not interview and make a news as you want to twist a fact, but Peter do not like you)? Am I right,isn't it? So you can make an answer in this forum. Everybody will see your answer at once.
Steve Kim
"George, Peter ask you the interview and whatever reason you do not say yes to have an interview. The meaning is 'No'. Am I wrong?"
Steve, please answer the following question with a yes or no answer:
Have you ever been caught ripping off passengers?
Yes or no? If you don't say yes, your answer is 'No'. Am I wrong?
George
who is george who is using language like i warned you not to lie. this is aggressive talk. police give warnings. or bullies. is george acting like a police or bully?
"pauli" "johal" "mr. hernandez" and "hassan" seem to be the same person...Peter Enger?
Please see the new thread posted above..........
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
who is george who is using language like i warned you not to lie. this is aggressive talk. police give warnings. or bullies. is george acting like a police or bully?
Who cares?
