General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: HEY CREDIT CARDS SUCK. We must take the city to court. credit card is unlawful!

i have said this many times. the city's credit card rule is unlawful and illegal. It's unlawful cos we are ripped off 5% of our money every time we cash those and when the card is bad, we lose the entire money. I have lost hundreds of dollars from this **** credit cards. People are taking advantage of this rule and giving us bad cards so they don't lose money. It's unfair to cabbies because we are forced the accept cards, but many shops and resturants and convineint store don't accept credit cards and even if they do accept cards, they have minimum of $10 or $20 purchase. The city made it law for cabbies but not for shop and resturant owners. That's why it is unfair and illegal and we must take the city to court regarding this. We must file a class action law suit against the city. We must ask for all the money we lost and we must put an end to the city's law of credit card for cab drivers.
We must do something and sue the city.
I don't know why George is very silient on this issue.
If George suport cab drivers, he should support us regarding this illegal credit card rule and challange the city.

You all talk about taking the City to court, but only the Seven have taken action

Talk, talk, talk. All of you talk about taking action, but the only bunch who have had the courage to at least TRY are "The Magnificent Seven".

Quite frankly, I don't know if we'll get past square one with that case. I'm going to give it my best shot.

But Judge Epstein may feel that the City had the right within its Home Rule power to enact an ordinance that gives Commissioner Reyes authority to revoke or suspend a c/l of a guy accused of a felony. He may feel that's not a violation of the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Judge Epstein may feel it was okay for the City to cut fares to Bridgeview and Skokie from the airports to straight meter. He may feel that's not a violation of due process rights of the drivers.

And Judge Epstein may feel that the gas surcharge is something the City had a right to enact over a fare increase generally.

Whatever happens in that case, the only way the City is going to take cabdrivers seriously is going to be when they have to face challenge after challenge in courts of law. Whether I am the lawyer handling it or it's someone else, you all have to find the courage to step up to the plate and swing the bat OVER AND OVER.

They won't take you seriously unless you do.


Donald Nathan

May be Gorege would be a lead plaintiff is this case or any others.

I'm sure that he is still a licensed cabdriver, which gives him the legal standing to sue.

May be he will sue for his rack this time.

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

Talk, talk, talk. All of you talk about taking action, but the only bunch who have had the courage to at least TRY are "The Magnificent Seven".

Quite frankly, I don't know if we'll get past square one with that case. I'm going to give it my best shot.

But Judge Epstein may feel that the City had the right within its Home Rule power to enact an ordinance that gives Commissioner Reyes authority to revoke or suspend a c/l of a guy accused of a felony. He may feel that's not a violation of the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Judge Epstein may feel it was okay for the City to cut fares to Bridgeview and Skokie from the airports to straight meter. He may feel that's not a violation of due process rights of the drivers.

And Judge Epstein may feel that the gas surcharge is something the City had a right to enact over a fare increase generally.

Whatever happens in that case, the only way the City is going to take cabdrivers seriously is going to be when they have to face challenge after challenge in courts of law. Whether I am the lawyer handling it or it's someone else, you all have to find the courage to step up to the plate and swing the bat OVER AND OVER.

They won't take you seriously unless you do.


Donald Nathan

Frivolous lawsuits with no likelihood of success don't concern the City.

Frivolous lawsuits with no likelihood of success don't concern the City.

-Mike Foulks

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

Talk, talk, talk. All of you talk about taking action, but the only bunch who have had the courage to at least TRY are "The Magnificent Seven".

Quite frankly, I don't know if we'll get past square one with that case. I'm going to give it my best shot.

But Judge Epstein may feel that the City had the right within its Home Rule power to enact an ordinance that gives Commissioner Reyes authority to revoke or suspend a c/l of a guy accused of a felony. He may feel that's not a violation of the right to be considered innocent until proven guilty.

Judge Epstein may feel it was okay for the City to cut fares to Bridgeview and Skokie from the airports to straight meter. He may feel that's not a violation of due process rights of the drivers.

And Judge Epstein may feel that the gas surcharge is something the City had a right to enact over a fare increase generally.

Whatever happens in that case, the only way the City is going to take cabdrivers seriously is going to be when they have to face challenge after challenge in courts of law. Whether I am the lawyer handling it or it's someone else, you all have to find the courage to step up to the plate and swing the bat OVER AND OVER.

They won't take you seriously unless you do.


Donald Nathan

Re: Frivolous long eared fools with no likelihood of success don't concern the City.

Frivolous long eared fools with no likelihood of success don't concern the City.