New Questions:
How long will Foulks wait for Weiss to "Just hurry up and die already."
What will he do if and when he runs out of patience?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
I have answered nearly all questions put to me, including these.
I find these questions to be more irrelevant than "intolerable".
It is the behavior of those who post lies, insults, misinformation, deliberate irrelevancies and other such nonsense I would categorize as "intolerable".
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
His can't answer. Those answers are consciously intolerable to Mad Mike Foulks.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: Re: Re: We've been down this road before, "MIKE FOULKS". You're In DENIAL
Name: montezooma
Date Posted: Sep 6, 08 - 12:22 AM
Message:
Denial is
a] an unconscious defense mechanism used to reduce anxiety by denying thoughts, feelings, or facts that are consciously intolerable;
b] a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a personal problem or with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the problem or reality."
So, Mike, have you ever:
a] committed a felony?
b] confessed to a felony?
c] been convicted of a felony?
d] served time for a felony?
e] been on probation of any kind for a felony?
f[ tried to extort $125,000 out of your dysfunctional family?
g] threatened to kill anyone if they didn't pay off?
h] warn anyone to stay our of dark allies?
i] plead guilty to charges of a felony?
Denial is just a nice way of saying CHRONIC, HOPELESS AND HELPLESS LIAR, Mr. Foulks, isn't it?
-m-
Peter Enger and Steve Kim of UTCC are liars.
Answers to your questions:
No. No. Yes. Yes. Yes. No. No. Yes. Yes.
Denial means denial. A denial isn't necessarily a lie any more than an admission is necessarily the truth.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: Re: Re: We've been down this road before, "MIKE FOULKS". You're In DENIAL
Name: montezooma
Date Posted: Sep 6, 08 - 12:22 AM
Message:
Denial is
a] an unconscious defense mechanism used to reduce anxiety by denying thoughts, feelings, or facts that are consciously intolerable;
b] a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a personal problem or with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the problem or reality."
So, Mike, have you ever:
a] committed a felony?
b] confessed to a felony?
c] been convicted of a felony?
d] served time for a felony?
e] been on probation of any kind for a felony?
f[ tried to extort $125,000 out of your dysfunctional family?
g] threatened to kill anyone if they didn't pay off?
h] warn anyone to stay our of dark allies?
i] plead guilty to charges of a felony?
Denial is just a nice way of saying CHRONIC, HOPELESS AND HELPLESS LIAR, Mr. Foulks, isn't it?
-m-
Here's a clue, "tremaine":
I read them before they were deleted. Mr. Lutfallah and I haven't "decided together" about much of anything, especially "what to delete".
I haven't even spoken to or e-mailed Mr. Lutfallah in about a month.
Who is the puppet? The UTCC, funded by the AFSC.
If you can't see the answers, you are as blind as Mr. Enger chooses to be.
Mr. Enger took many pictures of the people who came to that meeting. He has the answers to most of his misleading "questions" already.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
you are so rude. if post are deleted how can you see them? maybe you and george decide together what to delete an d he tells you what to say. who is the puppet?
i still do not see any answers to the questions. maybe taht is why peter posts again.
so gorge, where are the answeres? who are the leaders? what is the planning?
I thought they were married.
They CERTAINLY seem to share the same brain CELL.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
Current Chicago cabdrivers will have a chance to vote for someone "better"...
...during the next CCO Election on November 19, 2008.
Who do you think should represent us?
I'm positive than your sincere suggestions won't be deleted.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mad Mike Foulks is a CYBERSTALKER - A Class 3 Repeat Felon
Name: Sgt. Preston
Date Posted: Sep 10, 08 - 10:52 AM
Message:
There are several victims of Mad Mike Foulks' CYBERSTALKING on the website. The forum moderator, Goerge Lutfallah may also be held liable as well.
r. Foulks seems to be a poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care, which is free in and during CCDOC confinement.
Any one of his victims may contact the Chicago Police Department, the Cook County Prosecutor's office, the Illinois Attorney General's office for more information and how to proceed with filing charges against Foulks and Lutfallah for facilitating Mad Mike Foulks' criminal behavior on this and possibly other websites and forums.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.3 Stalking. Amended 2002.
(a) A person commits stalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions follows another person or places the person under surveillance or any combination thereof and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or
(2) places that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; or
(3) places that person in reasonable apprehension that a family member will receive immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(a-5) a person commits stalking when he or she has previously been convicted of stalking another person and knowingly and without lawful justification on one occasion:
(1) follows that same person or places that same person under surveillance; and
(2) transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; and
(3) the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(b) Sentence. Stalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for stalking is a Class 3 felony.
(b-5) The incarceration of a person in a penal institution who transmits a threat is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For the purpose of this Section, a defendant "places a person under surveillance" by remaining present outside the person's school, place of employment, vehicle, other place occupied by the person, or residence other than the residence of the defendant.
(e) For the purpose of this Section, "follows another person" means (i) to move in relative proximity to a person as that person moves from place to place or (ii) to remain in relative proximity to a person who is stationary or whose movements are confined to a small area. "Follows another person" does not include a following within the residence of the defendant.
(f) For the purposes of this Section and Section 12-7.4, "bona fide labor dispute" means any controversy concerning wages, salaries, hours, working conditions, or benefits, including health and welfare, sick leave, insurance, and pension or retirement provisions, the making or maintaining of collective bargaining agreements, and the terms to be included in those agreements.
(g) For the purposes of this Section, "transmits a threat" means a verbal or written threat or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal or written statements or conduct.
(h) For the purposes of this Section, "family member" means a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, or child, whether by whole blood, half-blood, or adoption and includes a step-grandparent, step-parent, step-brother, step-sister or step-child. "Family member" also means any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior 6 months, regularly resided in the household.
---
Aggravated Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.4. Aggravated stalking. Amended 1995.
(a) A person commits aggravated stalking when he or she, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, also does any of the following:
(1) causes bodily harm to the victim;
(2) confines or restrains the victim; or
(3) violates a temporary restraining order, an order of protection, or an injunction prohibiting the behavior described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 [750 ILCS 60/214].
(b) Sentence. Aggravated stalking is a Class 3 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for aggravated stalking is a Class 2 felony.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For purposes of this Section, "bona fide labor dispute" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12-7.3 [720 ILCS 5/12-7.3].
---
Cyberstalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5. Cyberstalking. 2001.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section:
"Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
"Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
Harassment
720 ILCS 135/0.01 - 135/2 Harassing and Obscene Communications Act
720 ILCS 135/0.01 Short Title Harassing and Obscene Communications Act 1957. Amended 1998.
720 ILCS 135/1. Sending obscene messages
Any person in this State who sends messages or uses language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor. The use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima facie evidence of the intent to offend.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-1. Harassment by telephone. Amended 2000.
Harassment by telephone is use of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
720 ILCS 135/1-2. Harassment through electronic communications. Amended 2000.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic communications device to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses, former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating relationship.
720 ILCS 135/1-3. Evidence inference. 1998.
Evidence that a defendant made additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic communications after having been requested by a named complainant or by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by evidence to the contrary.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-4. Psychiatric examination. 1998.
The court may order any person convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
720 ILCS 135/2. Sentence. Amended 2000.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1], harassment through electronic communications under Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2], or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2] or committed any similar offense in any state with the same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's family or household; or
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10 years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the Criminal Code of 1961 [720 ILCS 5/2-8]; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section 1-1 [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2 [720 ILCS 135/1-2].
(MOLR)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Current Chicago cabdrivers will have a chance to vote for someone "better"...
...during the next CCO Election on November 19, 2008.
Who do you think should represent us?
I'm positive than your sincere suggestions won't be deleted.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
The few who know Wolf already know: Wolf Weiss is a worthless idiot.
I am not a "cyberstalker".
I am not a "Class 3 Repeat Felon" (whatever that means).
I am not a "poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care". (I have never had a mental illness.)
There are no "victims" of any criminal conduct of mine involving this website or any others.
It's too late to tell you to grow up, Wolf. Just hurry up and die already.
You are a worthless idiot.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mad Mike Foulks is a CYBERSTALKER - A Class 3 Repeat Felon
Name: Sgt. Preston
Date Posted: Sep 10, 08 - 10:52 AM
Message:
There are several victims of Mad Mike Foulks' CYBERSTALKING on the website. The forum moderator, Goerge Lutfallah may also be held liable as well.
r. Foulks seems to be a poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care, which is free in and during CCDOC confinement.
Any one of his victims may contact the Chicago Police Department, the Cook County Prosecutor's office, the Illinois Attorney General's office for more information and how to proceed with filing charges against Foulks and Lutfallah for facilitating Mad Mike Foulks' criminal behavior on this and possibly other websites and forums.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.3 Stalking. Amended 2002.
(a) A person commits stalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions follows another person or places the person under surveillance or any combination thereof and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or
(2) places that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; or
(3) places that person in reasonable apprehension that a family member will receive immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(a-5) a person commits stalking when he or she has previously been convicted of stalking another person and knowingly and without lawful justification on one occasion:
(1) follows that same person or places that same person under surveillance; and
(2) transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; and
(3) the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(b) Sentence. Stalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for stalking is a Class 3 felony.
(b-5) The incarceration of a person in a penal institution who transmits a threat is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For the purpose of this Section, a defendant "places a person under surveillance" by remaining present outside the person's school, place of employment, vehicle, other place occupied by the person, or residence other than the residence of the defendant.
(e) For the purpose of this Section, "follows another person" means (i) to move in relative proximity to a person as that person moves from place to place or (ii) to remain in relative proximity to a person who is stationary or whose movements are confined to a small area. "Follows another person" does not include a following within the residence of the defendant.
(f) For the purposes of this Section and Section 12-7.4, "bona fide labor dispute" means any controversy concerning wages, salaries, hours, working conditions, or benefits, including health and welfare, sick leave, insurance, and pension or retirement provisions, the making or maintaining of collective bargaining agreements, and the terms to be included in those agreements.
(g) For the purposes of this Section, "transmits a threat" means a verbal or written threat or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal or written statements or conduct.
(h) For the purposes of this Section, "family member" means a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, or child, whether by whole blood, half-blood, or adoption and includes a step-grandparent, step-parent, step-brother, step-sister or step-child. "Family member" also means any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior 6 months, regularly resided in the household.
---
Aggravated Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.4. Aggravated stalking. Amended 1995.
(a) A person commits aggravated stalking when he or she, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, also does any of the following:
(1) causes bodily harm to the victim;
(2) confines or restrains the victim; or
(3) violates a temporary restraining order, an order of protection, or an injunction prohibiting the behavior described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 [750 ILCS 60/214].
(b) Sentence. Aggravated stalking is a Class 3 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for aggravated stalking is a Class 2 felony.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For purposes of this Section, "bona fide labor dispute" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12-7.3 [720 ILCS 5/12-7.3].
---
Cyberstalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5. Cyberstalking. 2001.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section:
"Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
"Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
Harassment
720 ILCS 135/0.01 - 135/2 Harassing and Obscene Communications Act
720 ILCS 135/0.01 Short Title Harassing and Obscene Communications Act 1957. Amended 1998.
720 ILCS 135/1. Sending obscene messages
Any person in this State who sends messages or uses language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor. The use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima facie evidence of the intent to offend.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-1. Harassment by telephone. Amended 2000.
Harassment by telephone is use of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
720 ILCS 135/1-2. Harassment through electronic communications. Amended 2000.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic communications device to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses, former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating relationship.
720 ILCS 135/1-3. Evidence inference. 1998.
Evidence that a defendant made additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic communications after having been requested by a named complainant or by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by evidence to the contrary.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-4. Psychiatric examination. 1998.
The court may order any person convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
720 ILCS 135/2. Sentence. Amended 2000.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1], harassment through electronic communications under Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2], or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2] or committed any similar offense in any state with the same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's family or household; or
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10 years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the Criminal Code of 1961 [720 ILCS 5/2-8]; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section 1-1 [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2 [720 ILCS 135/1-2].
(MOLR)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Current Chicago cabdrivers will have a chance to vote for someone "better"...
...during the next CCO Election on November 19, 2008.
Who do you think should represent us?
I'm positive than your sincere suggestions won't be deleted.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
If you're not denying something, you accusing someone of something, when you're not accusing someone of something you are calling someone a name or threatening them.
That, my fine-feathered felon is WORTHLESS. You might be worth something as an object lesson of how NOT to behave or what not to do and say in electronic communications.
This is how you "cope" with your own life, trying to make everyone else bad and wrong?
All the names, all the accusations and all the denying you can come up with won't clear your name or stop what is going to happen.
Get a lawyer, you may need one if you're thinking of spending Christmas home with loved ones.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The few who know Wolf already know: Wolf Weiss is a worthless idiot.
I am not a "cyberstalker".
I am not a "Class 3 Repeat Felon" (whatever that means).
I am not a "poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care". (I have never had a mental illness.)
There are no "victims" of any criminal conduct of mine involving this website or any others.
It's too late to tell you to grow up, Wolf. Just hurry up and die already.
You are a worthless idiot.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mad Mike Foulks is a CYBERSTALKER - A Class 3 Repeat Felon
Name: Sgt. Preston
Date Posted: Sep 10, 08 - 10:52 AM
Message:
There are several victims of Mad Mike Foulks' CYBERSTALKING on the website. The forum moderator, Goerge Lutfallah may also be held liable as well.
r. Foulks seems to be a poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care, which is free in and during CCDOC confinement.
Any one of his victims may contact the Chicago Police Department, the Cook County Prosecutor's office, the Illinois Attorney General's office for more information and how to proceed with filing charges against Foulks and Lutfallah for facilitating Mad Mike Foulks' criminal behavior on this and possibly other websites and forums.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.3 Stalking. Amended 2002.
(a) A person commits stalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions follows another person or places the person under surveillance or any combination thereof and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or
(2) places that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; or
(3) places that person in reasonable apprehension that a family member will receive immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(a-5) a person commits stalking when he or she has previously been convicted of stalking another person and knowingly and without lawful justification on one occasion:
(1) follows that same person or places that same person under surveillance; and
(2) transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; and
(3) the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(b) Sentence. Stalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for stalking is a Class 3 felony.
(b-5) The incarceration of a person in a penal institution who transmits a threat is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For the purpose of this Section, a defendant "places a person under surveillance" by remaining present outside the person's school, place of employment, vehicle, other place occupied by the person, or residence other than the residence of the defendant.
(e) For the purpose of this Section, "follows another person" means (i) to move in relative proximity to a person as that person moves from place to place or (ii) to remain in relative proximity to a person who is stationary or whose movements are confined to a small area. "Follows another person" does not include a following within the residence of the defendant.
(f) For the purposes of this Section and Section 12-7.4, "bona fide labor dispute" means any controversy concerning wages, salaries, hours, working conditions, or benefits, including health and welfare, sick leave, insurance, and pension or retirement provisions, the making or maintaining of collective bargaining agreements, and the terms to be included in those agreements.
(g) For the purposes of this Section, "transmits a threat" means a verbal or written threat or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal or written statements or conduct.
(h) For the purposes of this Section, "family member" means a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, or child, whether by whole blood, half-blood, or adoption and includes a step-grandparent, step-parent, step-brother, step-sister or step-child. "Family member" also means any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior 6 months, regularly resided in the household.
---
Aggravated Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.4. Aggravated stalking. Amended 1995.
(a) A person commits aggravated stalking when he or she, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, also does any of the following:
(1) causes bodily harm to the victim;
(2) confines or restrains the victim; or
(3) violates a temporary restraining order, an order of protection, or an injunction prohibiting the behavior described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 [750 ILCS 60/214].
(b) Sentence. Aggravated stalking is a Class 3 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for aggravated stalking is a Class 2 felony.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For purposes of this Section, "bona fide labor dispute" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12-7.3 [720 ILCS 5/12-7.3].
---
Cyberstalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5. Cyberstalking. 2001.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section:
"Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
"Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
Harassment
720 ILCS 135/0.01 - 135/2 Harassing and Obscene Communications Act
720 ILCS 135/0.01 Short Title Harassing and Obscene Communications Act 1957. Amended 1998.
720 ILCS 135/1. Sending obscene messages
Any person in this State who sends messages or uses language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor. The use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima facie evidence of the intent to offend.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-1. Harassment by telephone. Amended 2000.
Harassment by telephone is use of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
720 ILCS 135/1-2. Harassment through electronic communications. Amended 2000.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic communications device to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses, former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating relationship.
720 ILCS 135/1-3. Evidence inference. 1998.
Evidence that a defendant made additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic communications after having been requested by a named complainant or by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by evidence to the contrary.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-4. Psychiatric examination. 1998.
The court may order any person convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
720 ILCS 135/2. Sentence. Amended 2000.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1], harassment through electronic communications under Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2], or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2] or committed any similar offense in any state with the same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's family or household; or
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10 years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the Criminal Code of 1961 [720 ILCS 5/2-8]; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section 1-1 [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2 [720 ILCS 135/1-2].
(MOLR)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Current Chicago cabdrivers will have a chance to vote for someone "better"...
...during the next CCO Election on November 19, 2008.
Who do you think should represent us?
I'm positive than your sincere suggestions won't be deleted.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
"Just hurry up and die already."
Saint Michael strikes again.
Is that a reflection of your inner-most desire for the final disposition of Wolfgang J. Weiss?
OK! That's it. I am fixing to go out to Discount Gun World and checking out a new thirty-two, just in case the archangel Mad Mike Foulks decides to help make his "wish" come true....
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
The few who know Wolf already know: Wolf Weiss is a worthless idiot.
I am not a "cyberstalker".
I am not a "Class 3 Repeat Felon" (whatever that means).
I am not a "poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care". (I have never had a mental illness.)
There are no "victims" of any criminal conduct of mine involving this website or any others.
It's too late to tell you to grow up, Wolf. Just hurry up and die already.
You are a worthless idiot.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mad Mike Foulks is a CYBERSTALKER - A Class 3 Repeat Felon
Name: Sgt. Preston
Date Posted: Sep 10, 08 - 10:52 AM
Message:
There are several victims of Mad Mike Foulks' CYBERSTALKING on the website. The forum moderator, Goerge Lutfallah may also be held liable as well.
r. Foulks seems to be a poor, demented person who can't or won't get mental health care, which is free in and during CCDOC confinement.
Any one of his victims may contact the Chicago Police Department, the Cook County Prosecutor's office, the Illinois Attorney General's office for more information and how to proceed with filing charges against Foulks and Lutfallah for facilitating Mad Mike Foulks' criminal behavior on this and possibly other websites and forums.
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.3 Stalking. Amended 2002.
(a) A person commits stalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions follows another person or places the person under surveillance or any combination thereof and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person; or
(2) places that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; or
(3) places that person in reasonable apprehension that a family member will receive immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(a-5) a person commits stalking when he or she has previously been convicted of stalking another person and knowingly and without lawful justification on one occasion:
(1) follows that same person or places that same person under surveillance; and
(2) transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement or restraint; and
(3) the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person.
(b) Sentence. Stalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for stalking is a Class 3 felony.
(b-5) The incarceration of a person in a penal institution who transmits a threat is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For the purpose of this Section, a defendant "places a person under surveillance" by remaining present outside the person's school, place of employment, vehicle, other place occupied by the person, or residence other than the residence of the defendant.
(e) For the purpose of this Section, "follows another person" means (i) to move in relative proximity to a person as that person moves from place to place or (ii) to remain in relative proximity to a person who is stationary or whose movements are confined to a small area. "Follows another person" does not include a following within the residence of the defendant.
(f) For the purposes of this Section and Section 12-7.4, "bona fide labor dispute" means any controversy concerning wages, salaries, hours, working conditions, or benefits, including health and welfare, sick leave, insurance, and pension or retirement provisions, the making or maintaining of collective bargaining agreements, and the terms to be included in those agreements.
(g) For the purposes of this Section, "transmits a threat" means a verbal or written threat or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal or written statements or conduct.
(h) For the purposes of this Section, "family member" means a parent, grandparent, brother, sister, or child, whether by whole blood, half-blood, or adoption and includes a step-grandparent, step-parent, step-brother, step-sister or step-child. "Family member" also means any other person who regularly resides in the household, or who, within the prior 6 months, regularly resided in the household.
---
Aggravated Stalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.4. Aggravated stalking. Amended 1995.
(a) A person commits aggravated stalking when he or she, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, also does any of the following:
(1) causes bodily harm to the victim;
(2) confines or restrains the victim; or
(3) violates a temporary restraining order, an order of protection, or an injunction prohibiting the behavior described in subsection (b)(1) of Section 214 of the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 [750 ILCS 60/214].
(b) Sentence. Aggravated stalking is a Class 3 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for aggravated stalking is a Class 2 felony.
(c) Exemption. This Section does not apply to picketing occurring at the workplace that is otherwise lawful and arises out of a bona fide labor dispute, or any exercise of the right of free speech or assembly that is otherwise lawful.
(d) For purposes of this Section, "bona fide labor dispute" has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 12-7.3 [720 ILCS 5/12-7.3].
---
Cyberstalking - 720 ILCS 5/12-7.5. Cyberstalking. 2001.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section:
"Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
"Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.
(c) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
Harassment
720 ILCS 135/0.01 - 135/2 Harassing and Obscene Communications Act
720 ILCS 135/0.01 Short Title Harassing and Obscene Communications Act 1957. Amended 1998.
720 ILCS 135/1. Sending obscene messages
Any person in this State who sends messages or uses language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral with the intent to offend by means of or while using a telephone or telegraph facilities, equipment or wires of any person, firm or corporation engaged in the transmission of news or messages between states or within the State of Illinois is guilty of a Class B
misdemeanor. The use of language or terms which are obscene, lewd or immoral is prima facie evidence of the intent to offend.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-1. Harassment by telephone. Amended 2000.
Harassment by telephone is use of telephone communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy or indecent with an intent to offend; or
(2) Making a telephone call, whether or not conversation ensues, with intent to abuse, threaten or harass any person at the called number; or
(3) Making or causing the telephone of another repeatedly to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(4) Making repeated telephone calls, during which conversation ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number; or
(4.1) Making a telephone call or knowingly inducing a person to make a telephone call for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any telephone under one's control to be used for any of the purposes mentioned herein.
Every telephone directory published for distribution to members of the general public shall contain a notice setting forth a summary of the provisions of this Section. Such notice shall be printed in type which is no smaller than any other type on the same page and shall be preceded by the word "WARNING". All telephone companies in this State shall cooperate with law enforcement agencies in using their facilities and personnel to detect and prevent violations of this Act.
720 ILCS 135/1-2. Harassment through electronic communications. Amended 2000.
(a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of electronic communication for any of the following purposes:
(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;
(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person;
(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device;
(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;
(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic communications device to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in this subsection (a).
(b) As used in this Act:
(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system.
(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses, former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating relationship.
720 ILCS 135/1-3. Evidence inference. 1998.
Evidence that a defendant made additional telephone calls or engaged in additional electronic communications after having been requested by a named complainant or by a family or household member of the complainant to stop may be considered as evidence of an intent to harass unless disproved by evidence to the contrary.
---
720 ILCS 135/1-4. Psychiatric examination. 1998.
The court may order any person convicted under this Act to submit to a psychiatric examination.
720 ILCS 135/2. Sentence. Amended 2000.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a person who violates any of the provisions of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is guilty of a Class B misdemeanor. Except as provided in subsection (b), a second or subsequent violation of Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] is a Class A misdemeanor, for which the court shall impose a minimum of 14 days in jail or, if public or community service is established in the county in which the offender was convicted, 240 hours of public or community service.
(b) In any of the following circumstances, a person who violates Section 1, 1-1, or 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1, 720 ILCS 135/1-1, or 720 ILCS 135/1-2] shall be guilty of a Class 4 felony:
(1) The person has 3 or more prior violations in the last 10 years of harassment by telephone under Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1], harassment through electronic communications under Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2], or any similar offense of any state;
(2) The person has previously violated the harassment by telephone provisions of Section 1-1 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or the harassment through electronic communications provisions of Section 1-2 of this Act [720 ILCS 135/1-2] or committed any similar offense in any state with the same victim or a member of the victim's family or household;
(3) At the time of the offense, the offender was under conditions of bail, probation, mandatory supervised release or was the subject of an order of protection, in this or any other state, prohibiting contact with the victim or any member of the victim's family or household;
(4) In the course of the offense, the offender threatened to kill the victim or any member of the victim's family or household; or
(5) The person has been convicted in the last 10 years of a forcible felony as defined in Section 2-8 of the Criminal Code of 1961 [720 ILCS 5/2-8]; or
(6) The person violates paragraph (4.1) of Section 1-1 [720 ILCS 135/1-1] or paragraph (3.1) of subsection (a) of Section 1-2 [720 ILCS 135/1-2].
(MOLR)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Current Chicago cabdrivers will have a chance to vote for someone "better"...
...during the next CCO Election on November 19, 2008.
Who do you think should represent us?
I'm positive than your sincere suggestions won't be deleted.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
mf,
how do you know you read them before they were deleted? what if there were many more than you read? you would have no way of knowing, mr. fuzzylogicnonthinker.
cabdrivers deserve better than you and no-answer george. george can't even keep his own rules. he has no more logical brain than you do. you guys should get married.
