Mike Foulks and his cco gang often use cyberstalking as a method for persecuting those that do not share their particular beliefs.
Money, politics, religious beliefs, revenge, hate, and romance are the most frequent motives for cyberstalking. In fact, any situation that evolved from an emotionally packed incident are likely to include an offline component that can pose a real physical danger.
Cyberstalkers with a special grudge against the victim may be extremely difficult to stop. Their anger, jealousy and obsession may foil the common cyberstalking self-defense tips, and ignoring their contact may enflame them even more. No one should attempt to tackle a cyberstalker alone. The stakes are too high.
Don't be a victim! And, if you get the sense that the person may try to stalk you offline, call your local police immediately!
You're at it again - trying to bury discussion about the taxi business. Why do you keep doing this? Is it because you are somebody who works with people who don't want to see cabdrivers organized or helped? Look at the posting you are burying. "Concerned cabbie" is posting about assaults on taxi drivers and you're attacking others and burying it with garage about cyber crimes that have nothing to do with our industry.
One more nonsense posting from you and you'll be banned for a month.
George
Tell it to the investigators who have some questions to ask you about your website and your buddy, Mike Foulks!
Do you think this is some kind of game?
You're trying to bury criminal death threats against Wolf Weiss.
Foulks has also threatened others with physical violence before.
Both of you ARE being reported. Both of you WILL have to answer to these charges.
This has to stop or you will go to jail and your precious little website will be removed from the server by court order if necessary.
George, Four questions from one gentleman to another. 1) Why does Mike Foulks get your endorsement?
2) Was the previously mentioned meltdown a one time only incident?
3) I am starting to think you are of an agressive nature. This tends to scare off others. Do you agree?
4) Is "The Dispatcher" now a monthly publication?
These are serious questions. I can send you my email if you want to answer in private.
Mr. Lutfallah has never "endorsed" me, "Fatlu Hall".
When and how do you believe he did?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
George, Four questions from one gentleman to another. 1) Why does Mike Foulks get your endorsement?
2) Was the previously mentioned meltdown a one time only incident?
3) I am starting to think you are of an agressive nature. This tends to scare off others. Do you agree?
4) Is "The Dispatcher" now a monthly publication?
These are serious questions. I can send you my email if you want to answer in private.
Lets start with the nice article and photo of you and Saleem Q. in your new meeting room at the Chinatown Hotel. How about the text listing your qualifications and detailing your office hours. I'm sure I can pull up some of the earlier stuff George has written in the past about you to refresh your obviously failing memory.
As far as the questions go, perhaps they are too "hot" for George. If I have pointed out to George that in my opinion his agressive behavior has scared off some of his would be supporters, I have achieved my goal.
My memory isn't "failing", "Fatlu Hall". It's your vocabulary which fails...
I remember all of the things you want sum up as an "endorsement" by Mr. Lutfallah.
All of the things Mr. Lutfallah published as a report in the Chicago Dispatcher were true.
I think you are imagining "some of the earlier stuff George has written in the past" which you seem to think adds up to an "endorsement". Post and cite your references.
Mr. Lutfallah shares my belief that an organization of Chicago cabdrivers should be open and democratic to all Chicago cabdrivers. We don't agree on much more than that.
He has never "endorsed" me in particular at any point in time.
My "endorsement" comes from the dozens and scores of cabdrivers who voted for me in either CCO election. Mr. Lutfallah didn't vote in either.
I don't think Mr. Lutfallah is looking for "support". If this opportunity he has discovered and is attempting to show to Chicago cabdrivers (the Geoghegan plan) has been somehow slighted by any of his behavior, then your point is valid.
However, I believe it is the behavior of many other so-called "organizers" who have cast aspersions towards Mr. Lutfallah which would be more responsible for any unjust failure of participation with Mr. Geoghegan.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Lets start with the nice article and photo of you and Saleem Q. in your new meeting room at the Chinatown Hotel. How about the text listing your qualifications and detailing your office hours. I'm sure I can pull up some of the earlier stuff George has written in the past about you to refresh your obviously failing memory.
As far as the questions go, perhaps they are too "hot" for George. If I have pointed out to George that in my opinion his agressive behavior has scared off some of his would be supporters, I have achieved my goal.
by i said knock it off. knock it off.
