You should start a thread on one or more legal and law discussion groups about your case. I hear they have discussion boards and blogs for ex-offenders, too. If I was in your shoes, I would be reviewing all possible channels.
Why is it that they will almost always believe a guy if he confesses or pleads guilty, but if he denies the charges they say he is a liar?
Somehow the presumption of innocence goes up in thin air when a guy confesses, and no matter what the reasons or circumstances to plead guilty were.
It was previously posted that Foulks tried to scare $125,00 out of (name omitted in (town omitted), IL.
That's $250,00 as the rap sheet says:
the "defendant used electronic communications to wit: a telephone for the purpose of threatening injury to the person or property to wit: defendant called the home of victim (name omitted) and told (name omitted) that he would kill him if he did not give the defendant $250,000."
Anyway, we should let this sleeping dog lie? No? Why? Since Foulks is running for "office" of a taxi-related group he has been trying to form, his past, his present and his future are at issue and subject to close scrutiny, worse than a cross-examination.
We want to choose our leaders based on their abilities and capabilities; judgment, honesty, integrity, intelligence, wit, political prowess, poise, communications skills, brand of clothes, family relations, professional and civic relations, and activities and a number other equally important factors.
Did the victim really robe a bank?
I have to double check on the Federal Prison system.
It all started in the year of 2003. Was it in June or in July?
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
It was previously posted that Foulks tried to scare $125,00 out of (name omitted in (town omitted), IL.
That's $250,00 as the rap sheet says:
the "defendant used electronic communications to wit: a telephone for the purpose of threatening injury to the person or property to wit: defendant called the home of victim (name omitted) and told (name omitted) that he would kill him if he did not give the defendant $250,000."
Anyway, we should let this sleeping dog lie? No? Why? Since Foulks is running for "office" of a taxi-related group he has been trying to form, his past, his present and his future are at issue and subject to close scrutiny, worse than a cross-examination.
We want to choose our leaders based on their abilities and capabilities; judgment, honesty, integrity, intelligence, wit, political prowess, poise, communications skills, brand of clothes, family relations, professional and civic relations, and activities and a number other equally important factors.
Seems like the "victim" and the State can't keep their story straight.
Was it $125,000? Was it $250,000?
$500,000? One Million Dollars?
Maybe Regis Philbin asked them through their TV if they wanted to "go for a million"?
Is that a "death threat"?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
It was previously posted that Foulks tried to scare $125,00 out of (name omitted in (town omitted), IL.
That's $250,00 as the rap sheet says:
the "defendant used electronic communications to wit: a telephone for the purpose of threatening injury to the person or property to wit: defendant called the home of victim (name omitted) and told (name omitted) that he would kill him if he did not give the defendant $250,000."
Anyway, we should let this sleeping dog lie? No? Why? Since Foulks is running for "office" of a taxi-related group he has been trying to form, his past, his present and his future are at issue and subject to close scrutiny, worse than a cross-examination.
We want to choose our leaders based on their abilities and capabilities; judgment, honesty, integrity, intelligence, wit, political prowess, poise, communications skills, brand of clothes, family relations, professional and civic relations, and activities and a number other equally important factors.
Is that a "death threat"?
Who knows what the fed is going to say about it.
Can we guess?
