mike do you have a brain? don't you know when you do something? if you don't know it, who does?
i said knock it off.
go to your cco1 website to see how you violate rule #1
like below:
Date Posted: Dec 1, 07 - 6:49 PM
if you accuse me of 'taking' anything from anybody, you'll be hearing 'Mr. Foulks' over and over again in a courtroom and you'll be saying it out of fear or respect before I finish with you in the street.
By the way, you're 3/8ths schmuck.
Name: Mike Foulks
Date Posted: Dec 5, 07 - 1:51 AM
Keep on suggesting that I hate any particular group at your own risk. I am not above breaking your bones, no matter your age.
I hope my answer to your question is painfully obvious...like a foot in your ass.
Mike Foulks
Date Posted: May 9, 08 - 10:05 PM
Come get some, Wolf-howl, if you can keep your fangs off of Tang and Nathan's schlongs.
Do you want to see my wee-wee?
Do I have to kick you in your ass for you to figure that I am not a "figment"?
Mr. Flaimin' Foulks' reference to the CPTDA and the CRRC stating "these groups qualify for tax-exemptions" and his statement "That makes them everybody's business" are both incorrect.
Here is the general breakdown on not-for profit and non-profit or tax exempt status:
A not-for-profit corporate status (a sate charter) does not automatically provide federal or state tax exemptions.
A not-for-profit corporation must file and be granted a non-profit or tax-exempt status, which if granted provides discounts on postage, charitable donation tax write-offs for people who give such organizations money, exemption from local sales tax and other tax-exemptions and commercial discounts.
Not all not-for-profit corporations obtain a non-profit or tax exempt status, often referred to as a "501-3-c", which is reference to the provisions in the federal tax code.
A not-for-profit pays all taxes - employer-employee taxes on surplus income (profits in commercial enterprises) and is subject to all local and state taxes, just like a commercial enterprise.
In addition, not-for-profit employees and independent contractors must pay all applicable taxes, either on personal income or profits from their independent business.
The subtle difference between a for profit commercial enterprise corporation and a not-for profit corporation is that the latter is in business just to perform its stated functions and services, not make a profit and grow and expand like for-profit businesses do.
Neither of these groups are "501-3-c" status, thus the are neither tax exempt, nor non-profit nor charitable organizations. Thus, they are not necessarily anybody's business, especially not meddlers like Flamin' Mike Foulks.
Jack Spear
"Jack Spear",
Have you looked at the CPTDA website?
It says: "To engage in civic, educational and patriotic activities within the meaning of and compliance to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code."
If the CPTDA isn't actually a 501(c)(3), would this constitute a deceptive practice?
If the CPTDA and the CRRC do not qualify for tax-exemptions, are they non-profits in the conventional sense as described by state and federal law?
If the CPTDA and the CRRC aren't non-profits, why do their websites suggest or claim so?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
Mr. Flaimin' Foulks' reference to the CPTDA and the CRRC stating "these groups qualify for tax-exemptions" and his statement "That makes them everybody's business" are both incorrect.
Here is the general breakdown on not-for profit and non-profit or tax exempt status:
A not-for-profit corporate status (a sate charter) does not automatically provide federal or state tax exemptions.
A not-for-profit corporation must file and be granted a non-profit or tax-exempt status, which if granted provides discounts on postage, charitable donation tax write-offs for people who give such organizations money, exemption from local sales tax and other tax-exemptions and commercial discounts.
Not all not-for-profit corporations obtain a non-profit or tax exempt status, often referred to as a "501-3-c", which is reference to the provisions in the federal tax code.
A not-for-profit pays all taxes - employer-employee taxes on surplus income (profits in commercial enterprises) and is subject to all local and state taxes, just like a commercial enterprise.
In addition, not-for-profit employees and independent contractors must pay all applicable taxes, either on personal income or profits from their independent business.
The subtle difference between a for profit commercial enterprise corporation and a not-for profit corporation is that the latter is in business just to perform its stated functions and services, not make a profit and grow and expand like for-profit businesses do.
Neither of these groups are "501-3-c" status, thus the are neither tax exempt, nor non-profit nor charitable organizations. Thus, they are not necessarily anybody's business, especially not meddlers like Flamin' Mike Foulks.
Jack Spear
Ola!
I g n o r a m u s.
Hee-haw he-haw heehaw!!!
You Long Eared Father of Fools.
Any d*mbf*ck knows you include that language in your not-for-profit corp articles in case you decide to go tax-exempt between the time you incororate and doomsday, because may want to provide services and operate as tax exempt or non-profit org. This language is legally required to be considered and approved by IRS.
Is says to do so in any good "How to incoprorate" self help book in the books store.
Oh yah, you are Donkey Breath, you don't read books, you eat them.
Flamin' Mad Mike Flakey Foulks is a d*mbsh*t full of b&llsh*t as usual.
What does CCO mean?
Cockroach Crap Oder?
Only people who think in Donkey can't figure out what "To engage in civic, educational and patriotic activities within the meaning of and compliance to section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code"
means.
Shouldn't you name your not-for-real organization LEO, Long Eared Organs?
I have noticed many husband-and-wife teams both in private enterprise and not-for-profit organizations.
It seems to be spreading everywhere.
There is something going on, like married couples are taking over the world, business by business.
Before you know it, there will be husband-and-wife taxi owner teams, husband/wife charitable organizations, tax exempt organizations run by life-partner teams.
"Big Fat Mouth",
Was Michael L. Jackson a "life partner" of the non-profit he co-founded?
It seems that the "Hearts Foundation" had financial "questions", regardless.
http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=7321
May Haroon Paryani rest forever in peace once Mr. Jackson enters his permanent residence in Hell.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
I have noticed many husband-and-wife teams both in private enterprise and not-for-profit organizations.
It seems to be spreading everywhere.
There is something going on, like married couples are taking over the world, business by business.
Before you know it, there will be husband-and-wife taxi owner teams, husband/wife charitable organizations, tax exempt organizations run by life-partner teams.
It is good to know where he is now. I doubt he has ever confessed, or may be he is still appealing for his convictions. Who knows? There may be also a federal file somewhere classified.
http://www.idoc.state.il.us/subsections/search/inms.asp
R55799 - JACKSON, MICHAEL
Parent Institution: Shawnee Correctional Center
Inmate Status: IN CUSTODY
Location: SHAWNEE
Discharge Reason:
VITALS
Date of Birth: 10-19-1967
Weight: 177 lbs.
Hair: Blonde or Strawberry
Sex: Male
Height: 5 ft. 10 in.
Race: White
Eyes: Blue
MARKS, SCARS, & TATTOOS
ADMISSION / RELEASE / DISCHARGE INFO
Custody Date: 09/22/2006
Projected Parole Date: 04/03/2012
Paroled Date: --
Tentative Discharge Date:
Discharge From Parole: 04/03/2014
SENTENCING INFORMATION
MITTIMUS: 05CR0605401
CLASS: 1
COUNT: 1
OFFENSE: 2ND DEGREE MURDER
CUSTODY DATE: 01/27/2005
SENTENCE: 15 YEARS 0 MONTHS 0 DAYS
COUNTY: COOK
SENTENCE DISCHARGED?: NO
"Clueless", you truly are "Clueless".
Michael L. Jackson confessed to killing Paryani. He testified in his own defense in court.
He was appealing his conviction and sentence, I believe.
With good behavior, he will be a free man a less than 8 years after brutally murdering Mr. Paryani.
Why do you ask about bank robbers and sex offenders?
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
It is good to know where he is now. I doubt he has ever confessed, or may be he is still appealing for his convictions. Who knows? There may be also a federal file somewhere classified.
http://www.idoc.state.il.us/subsections/search/inms.asp
R55799 - JACKSON, MICHAEL
Parent Institution: Shawnee Correctional Center
Inmate Status: IN CUSTODY
Location: SHAWNEE
Discharge Reason:
VITALS
Date of Birth: 10-19-1967
Weight: 177 lbs.
Hair: Blonde or Strawberry
Sex: Male
Height: 5 ft. 10 in.
Race: White
Eyes: Blue
MARKS, SCARS, & TATTOOS
ADMISSION / RELEASE / DISCHARGE INFO
Custody Date: 09/22/2006
Projected Parole Date: 04/03/2012
Paroled Date: --
Tentative Discharge Date:
Discharge From Parole: 04/03/2014
SENTENCING INFORMATION
MITTIMUS: 05CR0605401
CLASS: 1
COUNT: 1
OFFENSE: 2ND DEGREE MURDER
CUSTODY DATE: 01/27/2005
SENTENCE: 15 YEARS 0 MONTHS 0 DAYS
COUNTY: COOK
SENTENCE DISCHARGED?: NO
The only good thing here is that this ***** SOB has aids. Perhaps he won't make it to the parole hearing. Does anyone remember what happened to Jeffrey Dahmer at trial?
Yes, you're right, he never was brought to trial/justice. Another inmate was paid to murder him. This assassin already was serving two life sentences. I'll bet this three time murderer is still alive in a prison in Wisconsin watching a flat screen and lounging around like a king. We need to import this guy to Shawnee and show him Michael L. Jackoffs picture.
This case really gets me upset. It is a clear example of the general public and the judge in this case looking at us as second class citizens. Less than six years? This is unacceptable! Jacksons dead body belongs in a hazardous waste dump. Nothing less. Does anyone reading think he would have gotten a death sentence in the State of Texas justice system? What if My Pyrani wasn't a taxi driver, but a well known doctor?
The word blocked out was qu ee r and yes I happen to know this guy was a ho mo too. Word from more than a few of the "boys town' irregulars that rode in my taxi in the days / weeks after it happened.
During his temporary ban from this forum, Peter Enger continued to violate the reasonable policies of this forum. He was warned that if he continued to violate these policies that his ban could be permanent. He continued to violate our policies. Thus he's been banned from this forum indefinately. If Mr. Enger wishes to have his suspension overturned, he may appeal by sending me an email.
George Lutfallah
Chicago Dispatcher
knock it off george
Dear Mr, Lutfallag,
Did you remove and/or bury your own re-posted articles, which contain numerous, errors, omissions and wrong info, because of this rule, or because of the rules that say when you screw and get caught, you hide or destroy the evidence?
It isn't a question of not being able to follow, but rather a question of not willing to follow the rules.
For examples of this behavior, which seems to be the norm in cyberspace - which would be deemed abnormal behavior in the reality-strewn world - see any and/or all of Master of Flamers posts.
Sincerely,
MOLR
We all know George's last name is LUTFALLAH, I hit the "g" key intead of the "h" key and didn't catch it before hitting "post." Really. Geo., no offense intended.
molr - the misspeller
you always allow to re post before. now you don't allow it?
don't mike foulks repost any poost all the time?
and mike foulks post before as 'president'. do you delete his post?
why don't you like UTCC? they are doing good things for cabdrivers. you say before you want to unity with cabdrives and all members are cabdrivers. i don't understand you george.
"jimmy",
I don't "re-post all the time". I only "re-post" my reply to someone else's re-post!
Donald Nathan was "re-posting" a lot. I think this is why the new rule was created.
It is annoying to have anyone copy and paste the exact same message in multiple places. All it does is force people who want to reply to do the same thing.
Posting any particular message in one spot should suiffice.
If you want to make anything a "sticky", all you have to do is ask Mr. Lutfallah to take it under consideration.
Mr. Lutfallah and/or Mr. Bullington has attended both CCO elections. All of the ballots are open for their inspection.
Neither has any doubt that I am the legitmately elected "President" of the CCO.
The are both quite aware that during both terms, all other electees failed to attend CCO meetings eventually, resulting in their removal.
All of the members of the UTCC shouldn't be held accountable for Peter Enger's obstinate disobedience of the rules and rightful requests that Mr. Lutfallah makes here.
Truth is, Peter Enger is only speaking for himself when he posts with "Secretary of the UTCC". There isn't any record that anybody elected Peter Enger to anything.
The "Chairman" of the UTCC doesn't even want to be the "Chairman". My advice would be for him is to renounce his "title" as it is clear that he is simply a figurehead who has no respected authority over Prateek Sampat, Peter Enger, or Steve Kim.
Additionally, the CCO isn't a commercial venture; it doesn't collect money according to it by-laws (which Mr. Lutfallah and Mr. Bullington also are quite aware of as I have provided them with copies).
The UTCC discriminated against me and other cabdrivers by not allowing us to attend their meetings and stating its intention and designs to COLLECT MONEY.
As Mr. Lutfallah has clearly stated, if Mr. Enger feels that he can promote his position in the commercial social-club "UTCC" at will, he is wrong.
He should pay for advertising if he wants his organization's name always at the top of the screen.
-Mike Foulks
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Replying to:
you always allow to re post before. now you don't allow it?
don't mike foulks repost any poost all the time?
and mike foulks post before as 'president'. do you delete his post?
why don't you like UTCC? they are doing good things for cabdrivers. you say before you want to unity with cabdrives and all members are cabdrivers. i don't understand you george.
do you call him 'mr. lutfallah' when you're in bed together?
