General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Are you in BensonHurst or Chicago sir? There were always murders of REAL Chicago cab drivers. Now the only ones I have heard being killed are the illegal non medallion ones. Mr. Cramden, will taking the shields out make the crime rate against drivers go down?

Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

*** Huuummm..!! Real Good Question Sir.However, I find myself wondering how this notion of having to make a " CHOICE " came to be.??? Why not BOTH a camera
and a safety shield / partition / bandit barrier ect.?
Crime Prevention Thru Enviormental Design must be a " PACKAGE "deal.Back in May of 2000, OSHA put out a " Fact Sheet / White Paper " making 10 recommendatios..NOT JUST ONE ( 1 ).** REPEAT..10.Many city's mandate BOTH a camera & safety shield...a prime example ( and they have STATS to prove the effectiveness ) is Winnepeg, Manitoba.!!!! A " SHINING EXAMPLE " of a Crime Prevention Package.BTW - ALL of the cab co's in the USA recieved a copy of OSHA's fact sheet ( approx.7,338 of them )..BUT, very few co's followed the recommendations.WHY ?..F..... MONEY.!!Safety On The Job Cost's MONEY..so do funerals, hospital bills.....WELL..U get my point.RIGHT.? How about IF we all take another look @ OSHA's recommendation & discuss THAT.?? Now, 4 THE RECORD = there is NO cure all, NO 100% safety....the ONLY way would be to ' ELIMATE CRIME '.!!Negligence / GROSS NEGLIGENCE on the part of the cab co.owners was the MAJOR TOPIC of a TLPA Newsletter ( "Dispatch" )( for members ONLY )a while back.Ask YOUR cab co.BOSS to see a copy of it PLEASE..& let us know WHAT he / she say's about it..eh.? The Dispatch Newsletter is dated.." OCTOBER 2002 "..the TLPA lawyers that wrote it were Arthur Herold and Charles M.Watkins, of Webster Chamberlain and Bean, Washington, D.C.!!( GOOD LUCK ).In closing, PLEASE check out OSHA's Fact Sheet on their website ( type in the word " TAXI ' in the searchbox )& scroll down to " Risk Factors & Prevenative Measures for Taxi & Livery Drivers." Here's OSHA's website: www.osha.gov ( sorry 4 such a LONG post y'all ) BUT... " Safety On The Job / Workplace Safety " must be PRIORITY # 1..!! If u don't believe ME..just ask your wife, son, daughter, mother or ANY other loved one who REALLY GIVES A **** about YOU.!! ( AKA - a " OBJECTIVE OPINION " )..well..kinda objective.!MUCH MORE LATER I PRAY..!!.. Most Sincerely & RESPECTFULLY Submitted F.Y.Info.Jim Sz.@ the I.T.D.S.C.( who will be MORE THAN HAPPY to mail / fax a copy of the TLPA's Dispatch Newsletter from Oct.2002 Titled:" NEGLINGENCE IN CAB COMPANY OPERATIONS ".!)P.S. = Please be sure to make a X-tra copy of it when your BOSS gives U a copy to give to one of your TRUSTED loved ones to give to a Lawyer in case U get: SHOT, KNIFED, RAPED, MUGGED or MURDERED.!!

Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Both? Who's going to pay for that?

Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Dagobert is right, drivers have their shield open, but at least the back of my head is shield to keep the passenger in the back seat from wrapping his arm around my neck while the second passenger digs in my pocket.

Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

I agree with Mr. Budzynski.

Even if the shield isn't closed (and over 90% of the time it isn't, in my estimation) it does protect the cabdriver from two- or one-man strong-arm robberies as he describes.

Cameras do add another source of safety for us; this isn't a one or the other argument. Both are valuable and can be used separately or together.

TED BUDZYNSKI FOR CHICAGO CABDRIVERS!

-Mike Foulks

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

Dagobert is right, drivers have their shield open, but at least the back of my head is shield to keep the passenger in the back seat from wrapping his arm around my neck while the second passenger digs in my pocket.

Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

I don't know if either are safe. The shield is not bullet proof. The attacker can kill the cab driver with the camera and then break the camera. I doubt either is safe

Selling my medallion

How long does it to sell a medallion? I might want to sell mine with car for 150,000.

Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Hello, You need to learn more about both of these items. The camera transmits the photos as soon as the guy enteres the cab. Breaking the camera won;t help him if it is actually working. We don't know the percent of time the camera is actually working right now. Anything transmitted via wireless signals can fail. Do you think the sykscrapers help?

The partition probably can't be penetrated 99% of the time if the guy is inside the cab woth the gun right against the partition. If the guy pulls the gun back and has some high power who knows? Time for mythbusters to investigate!

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Who needs Mythbusters?

They are about ratings not about truth.

A perp with a gun (which is the only logical weapon for assailants targeting cab drivers WITH partitions) willnever 'test' the bullet-resistance capacity of the partition.

Taxi partitions have an unbroken record/history of having, always... 'directing' assailants to use another window to pose a threat.

If a partition installed in a taxi forces an assailant to NOT shoot at the partition.... but instead prompts him to shoot through another window... where is the benefit?

SWC

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

Hello, You need to learn more about both of these items. The camera transmits the photos as soon as the guy enteres the cab. Breaking the camera won;t help him if it is actually working. We don't know the percent of time the camera is actually working right now. Anything transmitted via wireless signals can fail. Do you think the sykscrapers help?

The partition probably can't be penetrated 99% of the time if the guy is inside the cab woth the gun right against the partition. If the guy pulls the gun back and has some high power who knows? Time for mythbusters to investigate!

Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Wow. A good answer as well. What do we owe the appearance of the "nice" Mike to?

Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Ted, Thisis the most common of all cab driver robberies. I have not heard of it happening ever to one that has a shield. You are a wise man and this is why I nominated you for CCO president awhile ago. I still wish you would reconsider. I saw W. Weiss at the field a few weeks ago and he told me he would like to run for a vice president position with the CCO if you would run for President. Please reconsider Ted.

Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

Crooks are smart. They can figure a way out. When, the robber kills the cab driver. He will brake and probably steal the camera. As for the shield all cabbies leave them open all the time.

Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

The camera sends the image to a base as soon as the person enters the taxi. The quality of the image is to be determined. Ask R. Kelly about image quality and the effect it has on convictions. A guy can't drop the noose even if the shield is open. As Ted pointed out this was the most common robbery tactic. I don't close the shield when I pick up an 80 year old Jewish woman. I do close it before I let certain people in though. This is my right. I encourage other to think before they unlock the door.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ABout Cameras v. Shields - Remember this post?

I encourage YOU to consider what 'message' it sends to a passenger/assailant... when the driver closes the weapon access hole.

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Replying to:

The camera sends the image to a base as soon as the person enters the taxi. The quality of the image is to be determined. Ask R. Kelly about image quality and the effect it has on convictions. A guy can't drop the noose even if the shield is open. As Ted pointed out this was the most common robbery tactic. I don't close the shield when I pick up an 80 year old Jewish woman. I do close it before I let certain people in though. This is my right. I encourage other to think before they unlock the door.