British explorer and navigator Matthew Finders was the first to chart the coastline.
this sentence is written in my Grammar,usage, and mechanics workbook by holt mcdougel (wrong spelling) there must be an appositive/phrase.. i'm confuced
Mr. Matthews fails to grasp that the omission of the 'the' was a journalistic rendition of 'The British explorer and navigator", and has practice has entered the mainstream. THEY ARE NOW REGARDED AS EQUIVALENT - BOTH ARE ACCEPTABLE.
Mr. Matthews fails to grasp that the omission of the 'the' was a journalistic rendition of 'The British explorer and navigator", and has practice has entered the mainstream. THEY ARE NOW REGARDED AS EQUIVALENT - BOTH ARE ACCEPTABLE.
Totally irrelevant. Appositives by definition are post-head modifiers, i.e. they always follow the noun they modify. So with or without a determiner, the NP "British explorer and navigator" cannot possibly be an appositive in the example that was submitted.
Here are some other examples:
The murderer, the man with the scar, will be arrested soon. A university lecturer, Dr Brown, was arrested for the crime. A surprise present, a bouquet of roses, was delivered to my door.
In those three examples, the appositives are in bold, and the NP's they modify are underlined, not the other way round!
British explorer and navigator Matthew Finders was the first to chart the coastline.
this sentence is written in my Grammar,usage, and mechanics workbook by holt mcdougel (wrong spelling) there must be an appositive/phrase.. i'm confuced
Hi Zack
No need to be confused!
The appositive in your example is "Matthew Flinders". It modifies the NP "British explorer and navigator".